2017
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen for bronchiolitis: should we go with the flow?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ward-based HFNC protocols are often implemented to reduce ICU use, recent observational studies have revealed either no improvement or a paradoxical increase in ICU use following implementation of such protocols. 4,12,13 However, data from these studies were obtained when most institutions used agebased and modest (8-10 L/minute) flow rates. 3,4 Our findings suggest that weightbased HFNC flow rates may be an important component of ward-based HFNC bronchiolitis protocols that seek to reduce ICU use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ward-based HFNC protocols are often implemented to reduce ICU use, recent observational studies have revealed either no improvement or a paradoxical increase in ICU use following implementation of such protocols. 4,12,13 However, data from these studies were obtained when most institutions used agebased and modest (8-10 L/minute) flow rates. 3,4 Our findings suggest that weightbased HFNC flow rates may be an important component of ward-based HFNC bronchiolitis protocols that seek to reduce ICU use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these beneficial effects of HHHFNC, it has not been recommended by international guidelines. Nevertheless, the data are still limited on using this modality in ED setting …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, single center observational studies examining the association between ward-based HFNC protocols and subsequent ICU utilization have come to discordant conclusions. [11][12][13][14] Studying the effect of employing HFNC outside of the ICU is challenging in the context of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) because it is difficult to blind healthcare providers to the intervention and because crossover from the control group to HFNC is frequent. Two unblinded RCTs published in 2017 and 2018 found that children randomized to conventional nasal cannula were frequently escalated to HFNC (flow rates of 1-2 L/kg per minute), but neither trial found a difference in ICU admission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%