Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.719653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humic Substances in Combination With Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria as an Alternative for Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract: Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and humic substances (HSs) are promising options for reducing the use of pesticides and mineral fertilizers. Although many studies have shown the effects of PGPB and HSs separately, little information is available on plant responses to the combined application of these biostimulants despite the great potential for the simultaneous action of these biological inputs. Thus, the objective of this review is to present an overview of scientific studies that addressed the applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing soil to such a matrix medium of course is a brute, but for greenhouses apparently feasible simplification (Figure a). For farmland with its alternating climate, water, and light conditions and based on the above quoted observation that sustained fertility goes strictly with soil carbon content, people can differentiate essentially three anthropogenic approaches: (i) addition of manure and waste biomasses, , (ii) biochar addition, and (iii) natural and artificial humic substances (Figure b).…”
Section: Soils In the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing soil to such a matrix medium of course is a brute, but for greenhouses apparently feasible simplification (Figure a). For farmland with its alternating climate, water, and light conditions and based on the above quoted observation that sustained fertility goes strictly with soil carbon content, people can differentiate essentially three anthropogenic approaches: (i) addition of manure and waste biomasses, , (ii) biochar addition, and (iii) natural and artificial humic substances (Figure b).…”
Section: Soils In the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…HSs have been successfully used for increasing plant productivity in drought conditions [ 27 ]. Furthermore, a recent review recommends the combination of PGP bacteria with HSs as an alternative for sustainable agriculture [ 28 ]. However, it is emphasized in another review [ 28 ] that the number of reports describing the action of PGP bacteria in combination with HSs is extremely low in comparison with the great potential of this treatment option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a recent review recommends the combination of PGP bacteria with HSs as an alternative for sustainable agriculture [ 28 ]. However, it is emphasized in another review [ 28 ] that the number of reports describing the action of PGP bacteria in combination with HSs is extremely low in comparison with the great potential of this treatment option. We managed to find only one article showing a positive effect of the combination of PGP bacteria with HSs on plant growth in drought conditions [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, humic acids participate in the biological cycle of elements (carbon and nitrogen) [29], ion exchange, sorption processes, and soil detoxication processes, in addition to stimulating the growth and multiplication of endophytic microorganisms [13]. Other significant roles played by humic substances include their participation in carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions [30], prevention of droughts, and the shaping of soil fertility [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%