2020
DOI: 10.7554/elife.60690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humans disrupt access to prey for large African carnivores

Abstract: Wildlife respond to human presence by adjusting their temporal niche, possibly modifying encounter rates among species and trophic dynamics that structure communities. We assessed wildlife diel activity responses to human presence and consequential changes in predator-prey overlap using 11,111 detections of 3 large carnivores and 11 ungulates across 21,430 camera trap-nights in West Africa. Over two-thirds of species exhibited diel responses to mainly diurnal human presence, with ungulate nocturnal activity in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, over the course of our study, the hyena population was recovering from a major decline (Höner et al, 2005) and therefore likely experienced little competition for prey. Consistently abundant prey may also explain why there was no detectable effect of prey per capita on juvenile recruitment, in stark contrast to other studies (Broekhuis et al, 2021;Mills & Harris, 2020). Even if prey per capita within a clan territory declined greatly, there would be plentiful prey in other clan territories that hyenas could access by intruding (Höner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, over the course of our study, the hyena population was recovering from a major decline (Höner et al, 2005) and therefore likely experienced little competition for prey. Consistently abundant prey may also explain why there was no detectable effect of prey per capita on juvenile recruitment, in stark contrast to other studies (Broekhuis et al, 2021;Mills & Harris, 2020). Even if prey per capita within a clan territory declined greatly, there would be plentiful prey in other clan territories that hyenas could access by intruding (Höner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…While human population densities increased nocturnal activity for coyote, it decreased nocturnal activity for white-tailed deer, eastern cottontail, and raccoon. Prey species may become more diurnal to avoid increased activity in nocturnal predators ( Mills and Harris, 2020 ) or they may be utilizing increased human activity during daytime hours as a human-mediated shield. Prey species are known to spatially distribute themselves near human activity to act as a shield from predators ( Berger, 2007 ; Shannon et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human activity may influence prey choice, for example, when predators have multiple prey, or reshape multi‐predator effects on prey with more than one predator (Sih et al, 1998). To advance predictions of how human activity will affect species interactions, it will be beneficial to apply this framework to combinations of predators, prey, and competitors (Mills & Harris, 2020). One promising avenue of research lies in comparing how species richness, composition, and food web structure influence predator–prey responses to human activity (e.g.…”
Section: Linking Predator–prey Overlap To Ecological Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%