2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3141075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanlike Decision and Motion Planning for Expressway Lane Changing Based on Artificial Potential Field

Abstract: The autonomous vehicles (AVs) need to share the driving environment with the human driving vehicles (HDVs) on expressway in the future. The non-humanlike lane changing (LC) behavior of AVs can mislead human drivers, which brings potential risks. Stronger humanlike ability requires a more complex algorithm. However, the requirement of the on-board vehicle computation resources limits the humanlike ability of LC algorithms. In this context, considering environmental risks, driver speed requirements and driver fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we intentionally positioned the obstacle vehicle slightly ahead of the ego vehicle to simulate an urgent merging situation, which provides better observation of the paths of both vehicles. In addition, we denoted the following path planners for comparative study: i) PF-based planner with longitudinally constant speed (denoted as PF-CS) [16]; ii) PF-based planner with speed planning (denoted as PF-SP) [17]; ii) Proposed PF-based planner with interactive speed optimization (denoted as PF-ISO).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that we intentionally positioned the obstacle vehicle slightly ahead of the ego vehicle to simulate an urgent merging situation, which provides better observation of the paths of both vehicles. In addition, we denoted the following path planners for comparative study: i) PF-based planner with longitudinally constant speed (denoted as PF-CS) [16]; ii) PF-based planner with speed planning (denoted as PF-SP) [17]; ii) Proposed PF-based planner with interactive speed optimization (denoted as PF-ISO).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, The focus of the study was limited to low-speed obstacles with a single predefined motion. Similarly, Wu et al [17] proposed a PF-based lane-change algorithm for generating human-like trajectories while considering risks, drivers' focus shifts, and speed requirements. However, they did not consider the merging scenario and predefined the obstacle behaviors for observing the ego vehicle's path.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [ 23 ] took into account the influence of increasingly complex urban environmental information on drivers' lane-changing decisions. Based on the data generated by driving simulators, they extracted two decision rules in the intention generation and implementation stages through rough set theory, providing a theoretical basis for lane-changing decisions in complex driving environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the simulation also assumed the obstacle information was completely known, and only one obstacle was considered. Wu et al [16] presented a lanechange algorithm based on the PF that generates human-like trajectories, taking into account risks, drivers' focus shifts, and speed requirements, but their approach still required all obstacle information needs to be known in advance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation study, we have conducted three comparative path planners to illustrate the performance of the proposed method: (i) PF-based path planner with constant speed (PF-CS) [15]; (ii) PF-based path planner with speed planning (PF-SP) [16]; (iii) Proposed PF-based occlusionaware path planner (PF-OAPP).…”
Section: A Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%