2003
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200310000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanities Education at Northwestern University???s Feinberg School of Medicine

Abstract: The Medical Humanities and Bioethics Program at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine is responsible for humanities education in all four years of medical school: five units of the required four-year Patient, Physician, and Society course, 37 to 40 medical humanities seminars in years one and two, more than 125 ethics case conferences in third-year clerkships, and electives for fourth-year students. The program faculty also participate in ethics and humanities education in residencies, and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout North and South America and Europe, what we share, according to these sitespecific descriptions, is the belief that such inquiry can help students develop a "moral imagination" 19 and "self-reflective disposition", 20 "foster habits of discourse on social and moral issues in medicine" 21 ; and "engender…empathy for the patient's experience of illness". 22 These beliefs have become conventional wisdom, in spite of the fact that most of us in the medical humanities are leery about assumptions that what we teach makes students "better people with the 'right' character".…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout North and South America and Europe, what we share, according to these sitespecific descriptions, is the belief that such inquiry can help students develop a "moral imagination" 19 and "self-reflective disposition", 20 "foster habits of discourse on social and moral issues in medicine" 21 ; and "engender…empathy for the patient's experience of illness". 22 These beliefs have become conventional wisdom, in spite of the fact that most of us in the medical humanities are leery about assumptions that what we teach makes students "better people with the 'right' character".…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortyeight articles described a humanities-based intervention. Twenty-six of these 48 articles did not report any formalised evaluation outcomes (Goodwin 2015, Kemp 2014, Ortega 2011, Wald 2010, Joachim 2008, Kumagai 2008, Boudreau 2007, Meites 2003, Louis-Courvoisier 2003, Frich 2003, Acuna 2003, Murray 2003, Jones 2003, Hawkins 2003, Wear 2003, Fried 2003, Spike 2003, Krackov 2003, Sirridge 2003, Andre 2003, Montgomery 2003, Kirklin 2003, Rizzolo 2002, Sklar 2002, Downie 1997, Self 1990. Of the 22 articles reporting evaluation outcomes, 12 described learner satisfaction outcomes (del Pozo 2005, Wald 2015, Gurtoo 2013, Abdel-Halim 2012, George 2011, Karnad 1999, Shapiro 2003, Newell 2003, Anderson 2003, Lypson 2002, Bertman 1985, Wilson 1980.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22] Surveys of practice at medical schools are dominated by data from USA. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Recent review articles have called for more studies from elsewhere in the world. Studies from other healthcare settings are few and do not directly compare practice in the UK and elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%