2018
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanitarian nursing with Médecins Sans Frontières: Foregrounding the listening guide as a method for analysing oral history data

Abstract: It is argued that subjecting historical data to the listening guide can enable legitimate, creative exploration and analysis of data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the Listening Guide methods of data analysis can be applied to alternative data sources that are grounded in individual narratives (e.g. social service clinical notes, oral histories or focus groups; Fontaine et al., 2020; Golding & Hargreaves, 2018; Shefer et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the Listening Guide methods of data analysis can be applied to alternative data sources that are grounded in individual narratives (e.g. social service clinical notes, oral histories or focus groups; Fontaine et al., 2020; Golding & Hargreaves, 2018; Shefer et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, though all authors in this subset explored phenomena relevant to nurses, (e.g. people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, women with BRCA mutations) only two were published in nursing‐specific journals (Golding & Hargreaves, 2018; Rhodes, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They register power plays, conceptual variations and inconsistencies, debates and prejudices like any other organisational record. When they exist, more often than not, historians have had to complete them with oral history (Golding and Hargreaves, 2018). Laurence Binet, who has compiled and edited from humanitarian archives a series of volumes on controversies that entailed public 'speaking out' by MSF, always had to go beyond the mere documents available to reconstitute chronologies or context (Binet, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%