2016
DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v6n12p80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanising the curriculum: The role of a Virtual World

Abstract: Objective: Technology has changed our world; changed the way we communicate, the way we do business and the way education is delivered. As a result, undergraduate student cohorts come to university equipped with new technology, and educators need to transform the delivery of the curricula to satisfy a variety of learning styles. Nursing education, in particular, is developing and transforming to incorporate technology into the learning environment. Clinical placement opportunities are often sparse and alternat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Virtual simulation was purposefully chosen as it provides the ideal mechanism to tailor the missed clinical hours in a certain specialty. Virtual learning experiences support critical thinking and decision making while increasing student engagement (Ewens et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual simulation was purposefully chosen as it provides the ideal mechanism to tailor the missed clinical hours in a certain specialty. Virtual learning experiences support critical thinking and decision making while increasing student engagement (Ewens et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Ewens et al (2016) found virtual simulation experiences support critical thinking and decision making, while increasing student engagement. Cobbett and Snelgrove-Clarke (2016) completed a randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes of virtual and face to face clinical simulations and found no significant differences in student knowledge or self-confidence levels.…”
Section: Supporting Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%