Humane dog food? caring and killing in the certified humane dog food value chain

Abstract

The marketing of dog food influences pet-owners to nurture the ‘carnivorous’ nature of the dog, keeping animal-based protein central to the industry. Alas, dog food has a significant impact on welfare. Consumers are aware of this impact, shifting the industry towards alternative pet food movements such as Open Farm, the first certified humane food. This article examines the material and discursive practices through which ‘humaneness’ is constituted as a quality within the humane pet food supply chain and how it reinforces embedded animal hierarchies. By reviewing the marketing and history of commercial dog food production, I show how ‘caring’ for the carnivorous dog lays the framework for killing. I use Open Farm's transparency tool to trace the value chain and compare it with the imagery, discursive claims, and material practices found within the Global Animal Partnership standards. I argue that instead of questioning animal-based protein, humane certification creates an alternative in which the pet owner could still ‘care’ for the wildness of their domesticated dog while simultaneously ‘caring’ for farmed animals. Thus, it reinforces the hierarchies of the industry. Additionally, the validity of the humane claims depends on the animals’ charisma and proximity to humans. In other words, marketing in the humane dog food supply chain creates animal–animal positionalities, in which the animals’ care or killability is mediated through the humans’ supply chain and marketing. However, as I show with interview data, the hierarchies are fragile and must be continuously reinforced, as animals can slip into different positions. Their proximity to humans alters their positionality and their killability.

Kuinka koira puhutaan kasvisruokailijaksi? Diskurssianalyyttinen avaus monilajiseen elämäntyylipolitiikkaan

“…) Cudworth ( 2016) esittää lihansyönnin luonnolliseksi, normaaliksi ja välttämättömäksi tekevien diskurssien löytyvän koiranruokapuheestakin. Koiranruoan markkinointi ja sille tyypillinen villin koiran diskurssi näyttävät muodostavan kontekstin, jossa karnismin diskursseja voidaan uusintaa silmiinpistävässä ja kuluttajiin vaikuttavassa muodossa (Baker 2023). Koiran huoltajien onkin todettu epäilevän lihatonta koiranruokaa erityisesti siksi, että liha nähdään välttämättömäksi ja luonnolliseksi koiran ravinnoksi (Oven ym.…”