2018
DOI: 10.1080/02533952.2018.1441111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human waste/wasting humans: dirt, disposable bodies and power relations in Nigerian newspaper reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a number of contemporary reflections on 'waste' have attempted to break free from the traditional western and euro-centric outlook of waste management discourse in order to include valuable perspectives from the Global South, as well as centres of informality. For instance Oloko (2018) examines print media reports in Nigeria to examine the ways in which 'dirt', 'waste', and 'garbage' function as relational and socially constructed concepts within in-tersecting sanitation and social contexts. Oloko's (2018) analysis reveals that media coverage on issues of waste or sanitation often carries discursive undertones of power, in which emotive terms related to waste are often used to justify the exclusion of marginalised groups or individuals, such as sex workers or the poor, from general society.…”
Section: Thinking Philosophically About Wa-stementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, a number of contemporary reflections on 'waste' have attempted to break free from the traditional western and euro-centric outlook of waste management discourse in order to include valuable perspectives from the Global South, as well as centres of informality. For instance Oloko (2018) examines print media reports in Nigeria to examine the ways in which 'dirt', 'waste', and 'garbage' function as relational and socially constructed concepts within in-tersecting sanitation and social contexts. Oloko's (2018) analysis reveals that media coverage on issues of waste or sanitation often carries discursive undertones of power, in which emotive terms related to waste are often used to justify the exclusion of marginalised groups or individuals, such as sex workers or the poor, from general society.…”
Section: Thinking Philosophically About Wa-stementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance Oloko (2018) examines print media reports in Nigeria to examine the ways in which 'dirt', 'waste', and 'garbage' function as relational and socially constructed concepts within in-tersecting sanitation and social contexts. Oloko's (2018) analysis reveals that media coverage on issues of waste or sanitation often carries discursive undertones of power, in which emotive terms related to waste are often used to justify the exclusion of marginalised groups or individuals, such as sex workers or the poor, from general society. He concludes that in this context waste' and 'garbage' are not merely relational objects, but rather evocative terminologies adopted by the healthy and powerful to mark out a space of physical, moral and political non-belonging inhabited by the weak or marginalised (Oloko, 2018).…”
Section: Thinking Philosophically About Wa-stementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is not to say that fine critical philosophical, ontological, and epistemological deconstructions of 'waste' are not being written. On the contrary, over the past decade there has been growing interest in the wider role of society and culture in defining and structuring attitudes towards, and behaviours around, waste (see, (Ablitt & Smith, 2019;Hird, 2012;Reno, 2015;Spelman, 2011;Von Bemmel & Parizeau, 2019;Viney, 2014)) This includes a more recent increase in perspectives from the Global South (see, for instance Kalina, 2020a;Kalina et al, 2020, a, b;Oloko, 2018;Wang, 2019;Wu & Zhang, 2019). Furthermore, there has also been growing interest in the connection between tourism and circularity within South settings (see Jarman-Walsh, 2017;Little, 2017;Shaw, 2019;Suradi, 2019;van der Graaf, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%