2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.811334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human vs. robot operator error in a needle-based navigation system for percutaneous liver interventions

Abstract: Computed tomography (CT) guided percutaneous punctures of the liver for cancer diagnosis and therapy (e.g. tumor biopsy, radiofrequency ablation) are well-established procedures in clinical routine. One of the main challenges related to these interventions is the accurate placement of the needle within the lesion. Several navigation concepts have been introduced to compensate for organ shift and deformation in real-time, yet, the operator error remains an important factor influencing the overall accuracy of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured targeting errors, 2.0 mm ± 1.5 mm, are larger than the previously calculated 2.2 mm, which may be caused by insertion depth error and needle's bending in gelatin. A CT-compatible spherical mechanism for positioning a single probe also reported similar results (2.3 mm ± 1.3 mm) [28].…”
Section: Prototyping and Control Implementationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The measured targeting errors, 2.0 mm ± 1.5 mm, are larger than the previously calculated 2.2 mm, which may be caused by insertion depth error and needle's bending in gelatin. A CT-compatible spherical mechanism for positioning a single probe also reported similar results (2.3 mm ± 1.3 mm) [28].…”
Section: Prototyping and Control Implementationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…For example, one of the brachytherapy robots described in this report has been used for lung cancer, and clinical investigations are under consideration for other sites such as liver. [5][6][7][8] In the last decade, there have been significant increases in the use of robotic systems and automation tools in brachytherapy. Several groups have adapted and integrated such systems and tools into conventional brachytherapy procedures, with the shared goals of achieving higher precision and accuracy in seed placement, improving dose distributions, minimizing surgical trauma, and further reducing radiation exposure to staffs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experiences on robot-assisted percutaneous procedures have been reported in the literature in recent years. Good results have been obtained in terms of accuracy [17, 18], number of access attempts, time to successful access, and estimated blood loss and complications, compared to standard procedures where the radiologist has to rely on his/her experience [19]. The standard procedure usually requires several CT scans during the needle insertion to assess its actual position, exposing the patient to a considerable amount of radiation [20].…”
Section: Medical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%