2015
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00820-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Urine Decreases Function and Expression of Type 1 Pili in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Abstract: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the primary cause of community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs). UPEC bind the bladder using type 1 pili, encoded by the fim operon in nearly all E. coli. Assembled type 1 pili terminate in the FimH adhesin, which specifically binds to mannosylated glycoproteins on the bladder epithelium. Expression of type 1 pili is regulated in part by phase-variable inversion of the genomic element containing the fimS promoter, resulting in phase ON (expressing) and OFF (none… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The opposing activities of FimB and FimE, as well as stochastic engagement of each recombinase with the fim promoter, lead to mixed populations of bacteria that carry the fim promoter element in the fim ON or fim OFF state within the same culture (27). In addition to controlling the orientation of promoter DNA, transcription of the fim operon is subject to control by other DNA binding proteins that either affect fim transcription directly or interfere with Fim recombinase activity on the fim promoter (26,29,30,32,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposing activities of FimB and FimE, as well as stochastic engagement of each recombinase with the fim promoter, lead to mixed populations of bacteria that carry the fim promoter element in the fim ON or fim OFF state within the same culture (27). In addition to controlling the orientation of promoter DNA, transcription of the fim operon is subject to control by other DNA binding proteins that either affect fim transcription directly or interfere with Fim recombinase activity on the fim promoter (26,29,30,32,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mutation abrogates mannose binding by FimH but does not affect T1P assembly, leading to fimS being mostly phase OFF when grown in phase ON-inducing conditions. The mechanism for the higher phase OFF percentage is unknown, although chemical inhibition of FimH has the same effect (10). The percentage of phase OFF cells in the Q133K mutant was similar to that in the UIR mutants (Fig.…”
Section: Uir Mutants Regulate Phase Variation Through a Previously Unmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The sensing of T1P misassembly is not as well characterized as that for P pili, although it does not seem to proceed through the Cpx system (45). Interestingly, bacteria can detect nonfunctional T1P subunits; disrupting the FimH mannosebinding pocket by mutation (Q133K) or small molecule inhibition turns fimS phase OFF (10). In UIR mutants, the loss of appropriate pilus subunit stoichiometry (possibly affecting pilus assembly) also leads to negative feedback regulation at fimS and up-regulation of S pili independent of the fim recombinases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations