2023
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2022.3205510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human to Robot Hand Motion Mapping Methods: Review and Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to artificial hands, there are differences in movement, force, and sensory responses [129]. As a result, artificial hands need to be able to learn and adjust their movements based on experience and specific tasks [130,131].…”
Section: Control Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to artificial hands, there are differences in movement, force, and sensory responses [129]. As a result, artificial hands need to be able to learn and adjust their movements based on experience and specific tasks [130,131].…”
Section: Control Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various methods for providing the required data for dexterous manipulation based on employing various sensing and data collection techniques. Optical tracking systems [43], magnetic sensors [44], force and tactile sensors [8], and glove-based sensors [45] are the most common approaches. Human-to-robot hand motion mapping [46,47] is frequently required in several applications, and the approaches to address this problem fall under the following six categories [45]: direct joint, direct Cartesian, task-oriented, dimensionality reduction-based, pose recognition-based, and hybrid mappings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%