2010
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human TLRs 10 and 1 Share Common Mechanisms of Innate Immune Sensing but Not Signaling

Abstract: Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
255
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(106 reference statements)
3
255
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains the only member of the human TLR family without a defined agonist, signaling pathway, or function. Recent studies have suggested that TLR10 may be responsible for sensing of bacterial lipopeptides (12,25). Here we report that TLR10 acts as an innate immune sensing receptor for influenza virus infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It remains the only member of the human TLR family without a defined agonist, signaling pathway, or function. Recent studies have suggested that TLR10 may be responsible for sensing of bacterial lipopeptides (12,25). Here we report that TLR10 acts as an innate immune sensing receptor for influenza virus infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One study has suggested that TLR10 cooperates with TLR2 in sensing triacylated lipopeptides and recruits myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) to the activated receptor complex (12). However, they showed that native TLR10 coexpressed with TLR2 as a heterodimer in a human colonic epithelial cell line did not respond to lipopeptide stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29) inducing both genes the nuclear factor-kb signaling pathways. Nevertheless, with respect to TLR10, Guan et al 30 recently demonstrated that, although TLR10 is a partner for TLR2 on the cell surface and it shares a variety of agonist with TLR1, however, it fails to activate the typical TLR-induced signaling including nuclear factor-kb and interferon-b. These data suggest that NOD2 and TLR10 have different signaling pathways, which would explain the independent effects of both loci in the susceptibility to CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLR10 is believed to form heterodimers with TLR2 in a similar mode to TLR1, as TLR10 exhibits conservation of key residues at the dimerization interface and a lipopeptide binding channel, though lipopeptide binding has not yet been shown to induce signaling [40]. No data is so far available to confirm a precise agonist for TLR10, and no crystal structure is available for the ectodomain, though it has been shown to be involved in the response to viral infections, particularly influenza A [41].…”
Section: Tlr10 Heterodimermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…No data is so far available to confirm a precise agonist for TLR10, and no crystal structure is available for the ectodomain, though it has been shown to be involved in the response to viral infections, particularly influenza A [41]. Homology modeling studies indicated that like TLR1-TLR2, the TLR10-TLR2 complex is likely to have a large hydrophobic core surrounded by hydrophilic residues stabilizing the dimer interface [40]. The residues predicted to be in the hydrophobic core are L342', Y320', Y313', V311', P339' and I359' on TLR10, and Y323, L324, F322, P352, Y376, L350, F349, L371 and V373 on TLR2.…”
Section: Tlr10 Heterodimermentioning
confidence: 99%