2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Spreadsheet Interaction

Abstract: Abstract. Spreadsheets have become very popular tools for analyzing and visualizing data from business and science. To better understand human-spreadsheet interaction, we explore readers' information models, but in contrast to most studies we focus on spreadsheet readers rather than spreadsheet authors. We conducted a study using the repertory grid technique and analyzed the result with the help of a Generalized Procrustes Analysis yielding a deeper understanding of human's information model of spreadsheets. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the ease of spreadsheets and familiarity of end-users with spreadsheet logic and actions, storing and representing large amount of facility data in a tabular form with number of dependent sub-sections may have unintended effects and challenges in handling and interpreting COBie data, such as challenges in visualizing the overall content, duplication of data entries (during manual input), challenges in understanding data dependencies within and between the workbooks, memory overload due to high amount of numerical and text-based data, etc. Such issues have been noted in the literature about the usability and cognitive aspects of spreadsheets in general (Chen and Chan, 2008;Hendry and Green, 1994;Kohlhase, 2013;Thorne and Ball, 2008). Therefore, even though the cross dependencies between workbooks are accessible as drop-down pick-lists in the COBie spreadsheet, the main difficulty that end-users have in understanding the data in the multiple workbooks of COBie spreadsheet can be summarized as the high amount of data, and the lack of explicit dependencies between the cells and multiple workbooks.…”
Section: Representation and Publication Of Cobie Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Despite the ease of spreadsheets and familiarity of end-users with spreadsheet logic and actions, storing and representing large amount of facility data in a tabular form with number of dependent sub-sections may have unintended effects and challenges in handling and interpreting COBie data, such as challenges in visualizing the overall content, duplication of data entries (during manual input), challenges in understanding data dependencies within and between the workbooks, memory overload due to high amount of numerical and text-based data, etc. Such issues have been noted in the literature about the usability and cognitive aspects of spreadsheets in general (Chen and Chan, 2008;Hendry and Green, 1994;Kohlhase, 2013;Thorne and Ball, 2008). Therefore, even though the cross dependencies between workbooks are accessible as drop-down pick-lists in the COBie spreadsheet, the main difficulty that end-users have in understanding the data in the multiple workbooks of COBie spreadsheet can be summarized as the high amount of data, and the lack of explicit dependencies between the cells and multiple workbooks.…”
Section: Representation and Publication Of Cobie Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Spreadsheets have a tabular layout at the surface level, while the connection of the cells and dependencies is established in the deep level (Saariluoma and Sajaniemi, 1989). As a result, it is difficult for the user interacting with the tabular layer to establish the connections among the data distributed in cells and workbooks (Kohlhase, 2013). Users often have to use cognitively demanding visual checks to deduce the semantic connection among the cells, columns and workbooks (Hendry and Green, 1994).…”
Section: Research Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the large amount of facility data presented in tabular formats across many worksheets in COBie spreadsheet, there are usability challenges such as, visualizing the overall content, duplication of data entries (during manual input), understanding data dependencies within and between the workbooks and memory overload because of high amount of numerical and text-based data (Aalto BIM Collaboration, 2013). Many of these usability issues are also associated with cognitive aspects of large spreadsheets in general (Chen and Chan, 2000;Hendry and Green, 1994;Kohlhase, 2013;Thorne and Ball, 2008). In addition to these generic issues, there are challenges with COBie in terms of the understanding of the data structure, as well as the links with the 2D/3D models associated with the data (Yalcinkaya et al, 2016).…”
Section: Visualcobie For Facilities Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used as a usability/user experience method to research users' personal constructs when interacting with software artifacts (see [5,6,24] for examples). RGI has the advantage that it can deliver valuable insights into the perception of users even with relative low numbers of study subjects (seeo [12] for more details).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%