1980
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90359-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-specific nuclear protein that associates with the polar region of the mitotic apparatus: Distribution in a human/hamster hybrid cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
138
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm that NuMA was present in the chromatin fraction, nuclei were isolated from cells cultured under 2D conditions and treated to separate the chromatin from the nondigestible nuclear remnant according to classical chromatin fractionation methods (Wysocka et al, 2001). Western blot analysis indicated that NuMA was present in the nondigestible nuclear compartment obtained upon micrococcal nuclease treatment, in agreement with previous observations (Lydersen and Pettijohn, 1980;Zeng et al, 1994b). However, NuMA was also abundantly present (ϳ73% of the total amount proceeding from the chromatin and nondigestible nuclear fractions, as measured by densitometry) in the chromatin compartment ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: A Fraction Of Numa Is Present In the Chromatin Compartment Dsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To confirm that NuMA was present in the chromatin fraction, nuclei were isolated from cells cultured under 2D conditions and treated to separate the chromatin from the nondigestible nuclear remnant according to classical chromatin fractionation methods (Wysocka et al, 2001). Western blot analysis indicated that NuMA was present in the nondigestible nuclear compartment obtained upon micrococcal nuclease treatment, in agreement with previous observations (Lydersen and Pettijohn, 1980;Zeng et al, 1994b). However, NuMA was also abundantly present (ϳ73% of the total amount proceeding from the chromatin and nondigestible nuclear fractions, as measured by densitometry) in the chromatin compartment ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: A Fraction Of Numa Is Present In the Chromatin Compartment Dsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…NuMA has generally been considered a nuclear matrix protein because of its presence in fractions resistant to detergent extraction and DNA digestion (Lydersen and Pettijohn, 1980;Zeng et al, 1994a, b). However, there is evidence that NuMA colocalizes with the chromatin-associated architectural protein HMG I/Y (Tabellini et al, 2001)-thought to play a role in chromatin structure and transcriptional regulation-and also interacts with the putative transcription factor GAS41 (Harborth et al, 2000).…”
Section: A Fraction Of Numa Is Present In the Chromatin Compartment Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results further support that CLL cells exploit mitosis defects since under physiological conditions, NuMA localizes to the nucleus during interphase and is dispersed throughout the cytoplasm during mitosis 30, 31…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In female meiotic cells, in the absence of centrosomes, microtubules nucleated around chromosomes and then self-organized into a bipolar spindle (Gard 1992; Theurkauf and Hawley 1992). Various nuclear molecules have been directly shown to undergo a mitosis-specific redistribution pattern and associate with microtubules and centrosomes, including the centromere proteins (CENPs) (Pankov et al 1990; Yen et al 1991; Casiano et al 1993), the inner centromere proteins (INCENPs) (Cooke et al 1987; Earnshaw and Cooke 1991; Mackay et al 1993), and the nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) proteins (Lydersen and Pettijohn 1980; Compton et al 1992; Yang and Snyder 1992). Furthermore, the discovery of microtubule flux at both ends of spindle microtubules (Mitchison 1989; Sawin and Mitchison 1991, Sawin and Mitchison 1994), in conjunction with the demonstration that chromosomes whose kinetochore fibers have been severed by UV-microbeam irradiation still moved poleward (Forer et al 1997), suggest that current models for how chromosomes move to the poles are incomplete and that additional structural components of the spindle apparatus may exist (for review see Pickett-Heaps et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%