Human Security Norms in East Asia 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97247-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Security in East Asia: Assembling a Puzzle

Abstract: Human security was advocated by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) after the demise of the Cold War (UNDP 1993, 2-3; 1994, Chap. 2). A quarter of a century has passed since then, and some who were once enthusiastic about this concept no longer discuss it. However, when some lost interest, others took up the idea in other places. 1 It may thus seem to have faded out from time to time, but in reality, it did not. Where does this persistence come from?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…205-206). This interpretation of human security brought it closer to the overseas development assistance which led to some criticisms of Japan's version of human security being a mere "rebranding of international development" (Mahmud, 2023) or "social welfare" (Mine et al, 2019). Furthermore, some scholars believe that a "broader" understanding of human security might "inadvertently undermine the international human rights regime" (Howard-Hassmann, 2012, p. 88) for two reasons: firstly, because human rights become reduced to "a subset of human security concerns" (p. 103), and secondly because the individual standing in the human security discourse is less strong compared to the human rights agenda (p. 111).…”
Section: Human Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…205-206). This interpretation of human security brought it closer to the overseas development assistance which led to some criticisms of Japan's version of human security being a mere "rebranding of international development" (Mahmud, 2023) or "social welfare" (Mine et al, 2019). Furthermore, some scholars believe that a "broader" understanding of human security might "inadvertently undermine the international human rights regime" (Howard-Hassmann, 2012, p. 88) for two reasons: firstly, because human rights become reduced to "a subset of human security concerns" (p. 103), and secondly because the individual standing in the human security discourse is less strong compared to the human rights agenda (p. 111).…”
Section: Human Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 The limitation of human security as a category of research ( Paris 2001 ) has not affected the proliferation of human security studies. In the Asian context, the narrow-broad debate has catalyzed a multitude of conceptual and empirical research ranging from the narrow realm of freedom from fear topics such as the adoptability of R2P by Bellamy and Drummond (2011) to the broad investigation of freedom from want issues and the challenges of mainstreaming human security at national and regional levels as represented by the works of Nishikawa (2010) , Hernandez and Kraft (2012) , Teh (2012) , Howe (2013) and Mine, Gomez, and Muto (2019) . Freedom from want issues such as poverty, natural disasters, health outbreaks, migration, food safety, drug smuggling, and human trafficking are central concerns of many developing Asian countries and because of their more receptive outlook compared to humanitarian intervention may explain the interests and research tendencies of Asian scholars.…”
Section: Footnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Countries including Japan, Thailand and the Philippines have attempted to redefine human security to avoid confrontation between state sovereignty and humanitarian imperatives by emphasising prevention and sensitivity to local contexts. 12 The view that human security needs to develop towards a more inclusive paradigm in understanding various phenomena of human security has been recognised from the beginning. In this initial view, the reorientation of human security as a new paradigm should not be limited to conflict and crisis when a country is in need.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%