2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108676649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract: What is covered in this chapter:• The role of nonverbal communication in interactions between people-how communication is enhanced by facial expressions, hand gestures, body posture, and sounds; • The importance of interpreting, using, and responding to nonverbal cues in the appropriate way, both to successful humanrobot interactions and to generate a positive perception of robots; • Nonverbal communication channels that are unique to robots, as well as channels that replicate those commonly used by humans; • … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 231 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a relatively often discussed issue initially during the development process of ANEMONE was the nature and rigor of UX evaluation methods. We have experienced that UX evaluation as such is sometimes considered less scientific and less rigorous than psychological experiments that currently seem to be the most frequently used method to evaluate how humans interact with robots within the HRI field [ 7 , 8 , 68 ]. We emphasize that this way of arguing is like comparing apples and oranges, because their aims and purposes differ significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a relatively often discussed issue initially during the development process of ANEMONE was the nature and rigor of UX evaluation methods. We have experienced that UX evaluation as such is sometimes considered less scientific and less rigorous than psychological experiments that currently seem to be the most frequently used method to evaluate how humans interact with robots within the HRI field [ 7 , 8 , 68 ]. We emphasize that this way of arguing is like comparing apples and oranges, because their aims and purposes differ significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that these more complex interplays between robots and their intended users have to be carefully considered when designing and developing robots in order for them to provide the added value to intended human users, depending on the situation, task at hand, and the context of use [ 6 ]. The challenge of understanding and designing a natural, fluent, and trustworthy interaction between human(s) and robot(s) is the key factor of interest in the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. More specifically, Dautenhahn [ 10 ] characterizes HRI as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the term adaption to refer to the coordination of behaviors that are non-random and patterned in timing and form (Bernieri and Rosenthal, 1991 ) using a communicative lens (Burgoon et al, 1995 ). Although interpersonal adaption is often studied in face-to-face (Burgoon et al, 1995 ) and computer-mediated encounters (Dunbar et al, 2014 ), there is a growing body of scholarship that urges social scientists to further engage with HRI (Van Erp and Toet, 2013 ; Bartneck et al, 2020a ). Given that all interpersonal interactions have a degree of coordination (Gatewood and Rosenwein, 1981 ; Bernieri and Rosenthal, 1991 ; Chartrand and Bargh, 1999 ), it is essential to construct a framework to better explain why, how, and to what effect interacting with emerging technologies have for humans.…”
Section: Interpersonal Adaption Theory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example provided by Cappella ( 1991 ) is the tempo of the conversation—often measured by the rate of speech and the quickness of response. Bartneck et al ( 2020a ) argue contingency anthropomorphization of social robots can help users feel like the machine is partaking in appropriate regulation. For example, if the robot detects motion, “it should briefly look toward the origin of the movement” (p. 54).…”
Section: Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is still a lack of consensus on how the interactions should be addressed and which robot morphology might be most effective. Consequently, several design techniques have started to be explored, where participatory design (PD) ensures the acceptability and functionality of the robot [21]. Besides, PD methods have been adopted to develop interventions for populations with special needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%