Human Rights in Thick and Thin Societies

Kaplan, Seth D.

doi:10.1017/9781108557887

Cited by 18 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using the example of the USA, Dalton (2019) proves that the restriction of human rights for the purposes of national security is always a situational objective need, and therefore does not require additional detail in legislation. On the contrary, Kaplan (2018Kaplan ( , 2021 demonstrates double standards in the field of ensuring national security, while the US, defining its strategic orientation, manipulates any country by violating the scope of civil rights in it justifying the spread of their own expansion. De Bartolo (2018) makes the same conclusion, but in the context of the fight against terrorism and threats of violation of civil rights.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Balance of Private and Public Interest Law in Matters of Restricting Human Rights for the Purposes of National Security

Stetsenko,

Havronska,

Makarova

et al. 2023

Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The work deals with the issues of determining the balance of private (individual) and public (state) interests in terms of admissibility of limiting human rights and freedoms in cases where it increases or prevents threats to national security. This was the aim of the study, as this issue has become highly relevant because of the growing number of hybrid threats to national security, which can be countered through the introduction of separate restrictions on human rights by the state. The systemic approach, the hermeneutic, and doctrinal approach were used to conclude that almost all constitutions, constitutional acts and constitutional laws of the EU and NATO member states provide for the possibility of restricting human rights. Such restrictions are imposed for the purposes of national security, public necessity or national interests of the state. Moreover, the list of cases where the restrictions on civil rights may be applied in the national security interests in national legislation is often much wider than in international legal acts. This demonstrates the primacy of national interests over individual interests, which is defined by national legislators as the common good at the constitutional level. The lack of detailed cases and models of state response to these processes determines the conclusions on the need to introduce a system of legally determined conditions for the application of restrictive measures. That is why further research should focus on identifying and detailing the criteria for applying measures to restrict civil rights for the purposes of national security at the constitutional level. Received: 15 May 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 5 July 2023

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Balance of Private and Public Interest Law in Matters of Restricting Human Rights for the Purposes of National Security

Stetsenko,

Havronska,

Makarova

et al. 2023

Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This structure enables physicians to make themselves available to the community as a whole and treat their skills as their contribution to the group for the mutual benefit of its members. Medical service conceptualized as community "tithing" supports physicians' desire for altruism and also enables a community to evoke greater investment and commitment from its members (see Kaplan 2018). Peace of mind accompanies the practice for members of the community who want to avoid catastrophic costs and would like a physician they can see on a regular basis for a range of concerns from prenatal care to hospice.…”

Section: Ownership In Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physician Ownership for the Virtuous Practice of Medicine

Joa

2023

Linacre Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The shift from physicians as owners or shareholders of practices to being employees of corporations is now a widespread trend with over 50% of physicians now considered employees. If continued, this trend will have profound effects on the medical profession and on physicians’ personal lifestyles and sense of agency. However, ownership is not a morally neutral consideration but is important for safeguarding the traditions of virtue in the medical profession. Virtue develops within localized communities of practice and thrives in settings that embody principles such as solidarity, subsidiarity, and participation found in Catholic social teaching. Ownership increases physicians’ investment in moral communities where they practice, affording physicians greater agency to benefit these communities according to their best judgment. This ownership can vary by type of organization and degree of shareholding. Because moral communities are the settings in which physicians form virtue, and ownership increases physicians’ commitment and investment in communities, I make a principled argument that physicians who value developing virtue should consider having ownership of their practices when planning their careers. Ownership will be an important aspect of any medical ethics based on virtue rather than on principlism.

show abstract

The Tragedy of Human Rights

Rogers¹

2022

Wars, Laws, Rights and the Making of Global Insecurities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human Rights in Thick and Thin Societies

Abstract: Proefschriftter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 27 oktober 2017 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door

Cited by 18 publications

References 32 publications

Balance of Private and Public Interest Law in Matters of Restricting Human Rights for the Purposes of National Security

Balance of Private and Public Interest Law in Matters of Restricting Human Rights for the Purposes of National Security

Physician Ownership for the Virtuous Practice of Medicine

The Tragedy of Human Rights

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About