“…Numerous theoretical reasons have been proposed by different schools and various scholars about the occurrence of crime in urban settlements. Some of the reasons for crime commitment in urban settlements include densely populated areas, size and heterogeneity in cities (Clinard, 1942;Wirth, 1964), rational maximization of utility function as the results of a cost benefit assessment (Becker, 1968), unemployment (Ehrlich, 1973), inappropriate settlement conditions which creates the subculture of violence and poverty (Rogers, 1989), migration of young male individuals with rural family backgrounds (Muggins, 1985), the role of state in defining and creating crime in dependency theory (Rogers, 1989), city size, losing feelings of responsibility by men and anonymity of the criminals in cities (Braithwaite, 1975), lack of social control and deviant climate in large cities (Gumus, 2004), less formal and informal control and social cohesion (Hirschfield and Bowers, 1997), weaknesses of crime control bodies (Soh, 2012), gang operations and unawareness of the citizenship rights or spoon-feeding syndrome, lack of discipline, 'soul destroying' nature of megacities and the "aesthetic wilderness" of the cities (Braithwaite, 1975), increased opportunity to be exposed to deviance and negative effects of criminal behavior (Soh, 2012), law and management issues and freedom of armed uses (Elis and Liu, 2018), plenty of money obtained by crime activities in urban spaces, low probability of arrest, shortage in quality and quantity of security forces and equipment (Aksoy, 2017), congestion of population in city centers (Ghani, 2017).…”