2012
DOI: 10.1080/0305764x.2011.652402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human rights and citizenship education: re-positioning the debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose to use the two terms interchangeably for both theoretical and empirical reasons. Theoretically, the two concepts are highly contested and their relationship is a topic under heated debate in recent scholarship (for reviews, see Kiwan, 2012). Our position is in line with the argument that the concept of human rights implies a universal aspiration and the concept of citizenship implies rights accorded to members of a political community.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…We choose to use the two terms interchangeably for both theoretical and empirical reasons. Theoretically, the two concepts are highly contested and their relationship is a topic under heated debate in recent scholarship (for reviews, see Kiwan, 2012). Our position is in line with the argument that the concept of human rights implies a universal aspiration and the concept of citizenship implies rights accorded to members of a political community.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, if there are strong inter-group perspectives privileging the 'homogenized' us, inter-personal aspects of rights promoting respect of the 'human' might provide more balance over time and emphasize the universality of human rights in everyday practice (Kiwan, 2012). Although more emphasis on inter-personal aspects of rights will most certainly not 'resolve' the challenge, it might shift the focus by reframing back the human rights problematic as part of global and cosmopolitan citizenship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As Tibbitts (2002) and Bajaj (2011a) point out, human rights and human rights teaching signal different things to different communities; thus the tensions and challenges must be exposed and critically analyzed and alternative trajectories may need to be highlighted. For example, if there are strong inter-group perspectives privileging the 'homogenized' us, inter-personal aspects of rights promoting respect of the 'human' might provide more balance over time and emphasize the universality of human rights in everyday practice (Kiwan, 2012). Although more emphasis on inter-personal aspects of rights will most certainly not 'resolve' the challenge, it might shift the focus by reframing back the human rights problematic as part of global and cosmopolitan citizenship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative justice conceptions take justice to be dependent on factors like regional context, substantive equality for minority groups, and popular opinion (see e.g. Forst 1996;Kiwan 2012;Kymlicka 1995;Lister 1997;Sandel 1999;Tully 2014;Turner 1993).…”
Section: Theoretical Conflict Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%