Handbook of Workplace Diversity 2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608092.n3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Resource Strategies to Manage Workforce Diversity: Examining ‘The Business Case’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
2
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
127
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have argued that DEM practices also fall into this framework and are likely to provide firms with a competitive advantage (e.g., Armstrong et al, 2010;Kossek et al, 2006;Richard & Johnson, 1999). Specifically, diversity management has been defined as a strategy that firms use to more efficiently capitalize on the opportunities that diversity offers (Society for Human Resource Management, 2008) and goes beyond Affirmative Action and EEO-based programs (R. R. Thomas, 1991).…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers have argued that DEM practices also fall into this framework and are likely to provide firms with a competitive advantage (e.g., Armstrong et al, 2010;Kossek et al, 2006;Richard & Johnson, 1999). Specifically, diversity management has been defined as a strategy that firms use to more efficiently capitalize on the opportunities that diversity offers (Society for Human Resource Management, 2008) and goes beyond Affirmative Action and EEO-based programs (R. R. Thomas, 1991).…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been few efforts to measure their effectiveness (Cox, 1991;Cox & Blake, 1991;Ellis & Sonnenfeld, 1994;Konrad & Linnehan, 1995;Naff & Kellough, 2003;Richard & Johnson, 1999). Rather, evidence regarding the efficacy of DEM practices in creating a diverse workplace has been implied through the workplace diversity-firm performance link, research examining DEM practices as key factors empowering the degree to which a diverse workforce is more (or less) effective (e.g., Cunningham, 2009;Kochan et al, 2003;Kossek, Lobel, & Brown, 2006;Yang & Konrad, 2011), and organization stratification research (e.g., Goodman, Fields, & Blum, 2003;Kalev, Dobbin, & Kelly, 2006;Reskin & McBrier, 2000) studying the association between broad-based HR practices (e.g., recruitment) and percentages of women and minority groups in organizations. In turn, the focus of our article is to investigate the overall racial diversity (or variety; Harrison & Klein, 2007) in firms' managerial ranks, as (a) race is a major component of diversity in firms (Richard, 2000) and (b) managers influence strategic decision making and implementation of strategic policies (e.g., Burgelman, 1994;Dwyer, Richard, & Chadwick, 2003;Floyd & Wooldridge, 1997), both of which affect a firm's bottom line.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De plus, au sein de la structure organisationnelle, il convient de distinguer le pouvoir fort (pouvoir de contrôler l'allocation de ressources dans les organisations) du pouvoir souple, de fait plus en rapport avec le management de la diversité. On qualifie de pouvoir souple un pouvoir symbolique tiré de la possession d'un patrimoine de savoirs légitimes, jamais remis en cause et tenus pour acquis, ayant trait à un comportement décrit comme naturel car, plus ou moins consciemment, approprié et/ou autorisé par les autres individus de l'organisation (Kossek et al, 2006). Au final, on constate que, en tant que construits sociaux soumis à des requalifications continues, les concepts de diversité et de performance ne sauraient afficher ni une unité de définition ni une unité de mesure.…”
Section: Critical Management Studiesunclassified
“…C'est pourquoi Kossek et al (2006) et initialement Cox (1993) recommandaient d'apprécier le « climat de la diversité » d'une organisation à la lumière de trois dimensions principales : individuelle (structure d'identité des acteurs, type de personnalité, préjugés dominants), groupale (différenciation culturelle, dynamiques psychosociologiques de groupe, ethnocentrisme/altéro-phobie…), organisationnelle (culture d'entreprise, dynamiques inté-gratives structurelles vs informelles, processus d'acculturation professionnelle, « partialité institutionnelle »).…”
Section: Origines De L'hétérogénéité Des Résultats Dans La Littératureunclassified
“…Kossek, Lobel and Brown (2006) connected human resources management practices and workforce diversity with individual, group and organisational outcomes. Kossek and Lobel (1996) developed a model of HR approaches to diversity management presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Diversity Management and Human Resources Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%