2004
DOI: 10.2307/25487703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Remains and the Conservator's Role

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sizes of the bags needed constitute another consideration (see Table 1 for general quantities). It is important to choose an appropriate bag size for the element (Cassman and Odegaard 2007:113). Overall, the effort and costs associated with quality bags is balanced by the benefit of security for a collection.…”
Section: Recommendations For the Field And Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sizes of the bags needed constitute another consideration (see Table 1 for general quantities). It is important to choose an appropriate bag size for the element (Cassman and Odegaard 2007:113). Overall, the effort and costs associated with quality bags is balanced by the benefit of security for a collection.…”
Section: Recommendations For the Field And Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decade of work, collegiality, and friendship between the author and CRIA staff has ensured that the collection is well protected, and similar methods are being applied to other at-risk materials within the CRIA and region. Finally, one must also consider how new technology such as photogrammetry (see Novotny 2019 and Wrobel et al 2019, in this issue), photo documentation of box contents (Cassman and Odegaard 2007), and digital inventories (e.g., McManamon and Kintigh 2010) can protect previous data and reduce the need to handle delicate materials in extant collections.…”
Section: Recommendations For the Field And Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By giving some forethought to the handling of human skeletal remains, researchers can avoid most of the problems documented here. These suggestions are based on bone-care guidelines provided by conservators from museums and university laboratories (Antoine and Taylor 2014; Cassman and Odegaard 2004; Johnson 1994; McGowan and LaRoche 1996; Wills et al 2014)…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservation literature often falls in between these two areas, emphasizing the ways in which our profession engages both the tangible and intangible aspects of human remains. The main publications to date evidence our unusual, often difficult and ever-evolving role in the preservation of human remains (McGowan and La Roche 1996;Johnson 2001;Pye 2001;Williams 2001;Buenger 2004;Cassman and Odegaard 2004;Cassman et al 2007). Often at stake is the ability of disparate groups such as religious community members, curators, archaeologists, and conservators to control, present, and interpret human remains for the general public.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%