2021
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13080585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Relevant Sensitivity of iPSC-Derived Human Motor Neurons to BoNT/A1 and B1

Abstract: The application of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) for medical treatments necessitates a potency quantification of these lethal bacterial toxins, resulting in the use of a large number of test animals. Available alternative methods are limited in their relevance, as they are based on rodent cells or neuroblastoma cell lines or applicable for single toxin serotypes only. Here, human motor neurons (MNs), which are the physiological target of BoNTs, were generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring SNAP-25 cleavage as an outcome for BoNT/A sensitivity ( Table 1 ), human motor neurons showed an ~8000-fold differential sensitivity between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A4, while rat spinal cord cells showed an ~2000-fold differential sensitivity between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A4. This assay-specific difference may be due to the more sensitive human motor neurons cells, which were ~14-fold more sensitive to BoNT/A1 than rat spinal cord cells as also previously observed [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Measuring SNAP-25 cleavage as an outcome for BoNT/A sensitivity ( Table 1 ), human motor neurons showed an ~8000-fold differential sensitivity between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A4, while rat spinal cord cells showed an ~2000-fold differential sensitivity between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A4. This assay-specific difference may be due to the more sensitive human motor neurons cells, which were ~14-fold more sensitive to BoNT/A1 than rat spinal cord cells as also previously observed [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In comparison with the mouse bioassay, human MNs exhibit a superior sensitivity to BoNT toxinotypes A1 (0.003–0.5 pM) and B1. However, SiMa cells exhibited much lower sensitivity (5.5 pM) than human MNs, and appeared unsuitable to detect any BoNT/B1 activity [ 98 , 99 ].…”
Section: Bont Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell-based alternative methods have been established but must be improved to enhance sensitivity [3]. To this end, the coding sequence of a reporter luciferase (Gaussia luciferase, GLuc) used in a recently developed neuroblastoma cell-based functional assay [4][5][6] was incorporated into a genetic safe harbor of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can be differentiated into highly sensitive motor neurons [7] by the CRISPR/Cas9 method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%