Nonlinear Analysis of Physiological Data 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-71949-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Postural Control: Force Plate Experiments and Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that failures to decouple ankle dorsi-/plantar-flexion and hip abduction/adduction may contribute to postural disruptions during dynamic stances in ASD. Increased dependency of COP AP and COP ML in ASD may reflect a reduced ability to evoke distinct motor control processes and move towards the target without generating unwanted body movements in orthogonal directions [26, 27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings suggest that failures to decouple ankle dorsi-/plantar-flexion and hip abduction/adduction may contribute to postural disruptions during dynamic stances in ASD. Increased dependency of COP AP and COP ML in ASD may reflect a reduced ability to evoke distinct motor control processes and move towards the target without generating unwanted body movements in orthogonal directions [26, 27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two distinct joint movements show moderate dependency when healthy individuals attempt to remain still while standing indicating that a certain amount of shared information between ankle and hip joint movements is necessary for individuals to maintain balance. In patients with neurodegenerative disorders or when healthy participants close their eyes, a significant increase in shared information has been observed indicating an increased dependency of ankle and hip coordination when postural control systems are compromised [27] or under challenging conditions [26]. On the contrary, during self-initiated dynamic stances in which participants’ sway is targeted in one direction (i.e., either the AP or ML direction), a reduction in shared information is expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rather than producing stereotyped rhythms as they were previously thought, they are considered nowadays to be far more flexible systems that can exploit the body dynamics instead of guiding them (cf., Bizzi and Clarac 1999;Rosenblum et al 1998;Selverston et al 2000;Rabinovich et al 2006). For instance, they can adapt their rhythms to the body's ongoing motion via proprioceptive feedback (see Grillner 2006;Levi et al 2005;Ivanenko et al 2005;Lockhart and Ting 2007) and follow multiple synergies at the same time and/or dismiss others (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that this follows from the fact that at a certain time the postural system cannot distinguish between a random and applied perturbation, which suggests that the same neuromuscular control mechanisms are used under quiet-standing and dynamic conditions. Rosenblum et al (1998) described the behavior of the COP with two coupled chaotic oscillators. Inverted-pendulum models have also been shown to be capable of reproducing experimental sway data (Eurich and Milton 1996;Peterka 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%