2006
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.44.5.1755-1762.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Integration in Cervical Carcinoma In Situ and in Invasive Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

16
204
1
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
16
204
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Using 12 cervical cancer samples positive for HPV 16 (unpublished data), we determined E2/E6 ratio and found that 92% of the samples had a mixture of episomal and integrated forms of HPV genome, and 8% of the samples had HPV integrated into the host genome. The method, similar to ours, showed that 65 -97% of the cervical cancer cases had HPV 16 integration, which was frequently accompanied by episomal-form HPV (Peitsaro et al, 2002;Arias-Pulido et al, 2006). In the present study, a viral load in each specimen was expressed as the number of HPV copies/genome equivalent or cell, using a conversion factor of 6.6 pg of DNA cell À1 in order to make comparisons with the results of other studies (Si et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Using 12 cervical cancer samples positive for HPV 16 (unpublished data), we determined E2/E6 ratio and found that 92% of the samples had a mixture of episomal and integrated forms of HPV genome, and 8% of the samples had HPV integrated into the host genome. The method, similar to ours, showed that 65 -97% of the cervical cancer cases had HPV 16 integration, which was frequently accompanied by episomal-form HPV (Peitsaro et al, 2002;Arias-Pulido et al, 2006). In the present study, a viral load in each specimen was expressed as the number of HPV copies/genome equivalent or cell, using a conversion factor of 6.6 pg of DNA cell À1 in order to make comparisons with the results of other studies (Si et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…the nearly complete lack of methylation at position 7862 in all samples, and the selective hypermethylation of promoter sequences in some samples, have become a recurrent theme of HPV-16 methylation patterns in any anatomic site, and are clearly properties of the viral DNA irrespective of the anatomical site of the affected host cell. It has been pointed out by others 35 that promoter methylation may favor carcinogenesis, as it prohibits binding of the E2 protein, 38 which is a repressor of the E6 promoter, and assures continued oncogene expression even in the subpopulation of lesions that did not lose E2 as a consequence of genomic interruption. 39 The data of this study and our previous studies provide strong support that the measurement of DNA methylation is a useful biomarker to characterize malignant lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 In most published studies of cervical carcinoma, the integrated forms of HPV 16 were also observed in either all or a majority of the specimens. 42,43 AriasPulido et al 22 recently conducted a study of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded as well as fresh cervical specimens using qRT-PCR and reported a relatively low proportion of the integrated type of HPV 16 in carcinoma in situ (30.3%) and in invasive carcinoma (60.9%). The discrepancies of HPV 16 integration in the published studies may be resulted by different primers targeting different E1 or E2 regions and the effect of the adjacent tissue around the targeted lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs by disruption or deletion of the viral E1 and/or E2 open reading frame, which releases the suppressive effect of the E2 protein on the viral oncogenes E6 and E7, leading to the activation of E6 and E7 transcription. [19][20][21][22] The E6 and E7 oncogenic potencies of HPV 16 is clearly associated with promoting the transformation and immortalization of infected cells. 23 Consequently, HPV 16 integration provides a selective growth advantage in the infected cells and is associated with treatment failure or a shortened disease-free survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%