2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008054.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions

Abstract: Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
154
3
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 354 publications
9
154
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggest that HPV testing can be recommended to triage women with ASCUS because it has higher accuracy (significantly higher sensitivity and similar specificity) than repeat cytology. They also point out that, in triaging women with LSIL, an HPV test yields a significantly higher sensitivity, but a significantly lower specificity, compared to a repeat cytology [20]. In line with these observations, in our study, we did not find significant correlation (P < 0.05) between HPV (C) status detected by PCR amplification of HPV DNA and cytological LSIL/HSIL changes ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors suggest that HPV testing can be recommended to triage women with ASCUS because it has higher accuracy (significantly higher sensitivity and similar specificity) than repeat cytology. They also point out that, in triaging women with LSIL, an HPV test yields a significantly higher sensitivity, but a significantly lower specificity, compared to a repeat cytology [20]. In line with these observations, in our study, we did not find significant correlation (P < 0.05) between HPV (C) status detected by PCR amplification of HPV DNA and cytological LSIL/HSIL changes ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…That is why it has been recommended to adhere to current guidelines in this population [19]. The review study of Arbyn et al [20] compared the accuracy of HPV testing against that of repeat cytology for detection of underlying CIN of grade 2 or worse (CIN 2C) or grade 3 or worse (CIN 3C) in women with ASCUS or LSIL. The authors suggest that HPV testing can be recommended to triage women with ASCUS because it has higher accuracy (significantly higher sensitivity and similar specificity) than repeat cytology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reasons described above, these test characteristics for primary HPV testing are considered to be conservative assumptions. Observed sensitivity for women with dLSIL , Arbyn et al 2013 Observed specificity for women with dLSIL , Arbyn et al 2013 Extensive sensitivity analysis was performed using a range of screening test characteristics for each test. These involved use of 'best-case' and 'worst-case' relative test performances compared to conventional cytology, which were consistent with the 95% CIs of the summary estimates of relative performance from the international metaanalyses for manually-read LBC and for HPV testing, and consistent with the range of outcomes observed in image-read LBC studies.…”
Section: Hpv Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ID is the study identifier, DIS is the number of diseased, TP is the number of true positives, NonDis is the number of healthy and TN is the number of true negatives. Arbyn et al (2012) and Arbyn et al (2013) …”
Section: Model Comparison and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%