2011
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papillomavirus prevalence among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian women prior to a national HPV vaccination program

Abstract: BackgroundIndigenous women in Australia have a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer despite a national cervical screening program. Prior to introduction of a national human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination program, we determined HPV genotype prevalence by Indigenous status and residence in remote areas.MethodsWe recruited women aged 17 to 40 years presenting to community-based primary health services for routine Pap screening across Australia. A liquid-based cytology (LBC) cervical specimen was tested f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
64
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees only in part with a recent meta-analysis where HPV 16, 31, 18, 39, 33, and 66 were the most common types among European women (19). Our finding that HPV 51 was the second most common HPV type after HPV 16 is in accordance with the Australian survey (10). HPV-type distributions among men have been variable, with HPV 59, 16, 52, and 51 being most common among Mexican men (20), and HPV 6, 16 and 59, 52, and 39 among men from the United States (21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees only in part with a recent meta-analysis where HPV 16, 31, 18, 39, 33, and 66 were the most common types among European women (19). Our finding that HPV 51 was the second most common HPV type after HPV 16 is in accordance with the Australian survey (10). HPV-type distributions among men have been variable, with HPV 59, 16, 52, and 51 being most common among Mexican men (20), and HPV 6, 16 and 59, 52, and 39 among men from the United States (21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Female high-risk HPV prevalence in cervicovaginal swab samples in the United States among 20-to 24-year-olds has been estimated to be 43.4% (9), slightly lower than what we found in the corresponding age group (56.9%). In Australia, the age-adjusted baseline high-risk HPV prevalence in cervical swab samples among 15-to 40-year-old women was 30.0% and 31.3% for nonindigenous and indigenous Australian women, respectively (10). This is also slightly lower than what we found in the corresponding age group (45.2%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…12) and among non-Indigenous and Indigenous women in Australia (41.5% and 47.5%, respectively; ref. 13). Similarly to our survey, the highest HPV prevalences were detected in women younger than 25 years, but findings must be compared with caution due to the use of a PCR assay (PGMY09/ PGMY11) that has higher analytic sensitivity than GP5 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Smoking exposure-a welldocumented environmental factor-is a leading cause of many types of cancer such as lung, esophageal, gastric, bladder, liver and cervical cancers (Tredaniel et al, 1997;Kinjo et al, 1998;Gallus et al, 2001;Sobue et al, 2002 ;Settheetham-Ishida et al, 2004;Samanic et al, 2006;Settheetham-Ishida et al, 2006;Syrjanen et al, 2007;Pesch et al, 2011). An increased risk of cervical cancer associated with tobacco smoking has been found in many studies (Haverkos et al, 2003;SettheethamIshida et al, 2004;Garland et al, 2011;Yetimalar et al, 2011). Among HPV-positive women, an increased risk of cervical cancer was demonstrated among smokers than non-smokers (Kapeu et al, 2009;Plummer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%