2009
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00278-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Papillomavirus Genotype Specificity of Hybrid Capture 2 Low-Risk Probe Cocktail

Abstract: A genotyping study of 285 Hybrid Capture 2 low-risk probe cocktail-positive specimens showed crossreactivity with several untargeted human papillomavirus genotypes. Cross-reactivity was often clinically beneficial due to the detection of untargeted low-risk genotypes. A total of 8.4% of positive results, usually weak, were due to cross-reactivity with high-risk genotypes. Establishment of a gray zone is recommended.Low-risk alpha-human papillomaviruses (HPV) have never been at the fore in HPV research, due to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible explanation for the greater correlation of cancer development with detection and genotyping by the RFMP assay, compared to the PCR followed by oligohybridization method, could be ascribed to higher specificity and the capacity to identify a broader span of genotypes, leading to fewer positive results in controls and higher positivity in patients. Thus, the RFMP method has both greater clinical sensitivity and specificity for detecting and genotyping HPV in various levels of cervical lesions and comparable or superior analytical sensitivity for the number of HPV copies that could be detected, compared with most other reported methods [Kocjan et al, 2008; Poljak et al, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible explanation for the greater correlation of cancer development with detection and genotyping by the RFMP assay, compared to the PCR followed by oligohybridization method, could be ascribed to higher specificity and the capacity to identify a broader span of genotypes, leading to fewer positive results in controls and higher positivity in patients. Thus, the RFMP method has both greater clinical sensitivity and specificity for detecting and genotyping HPV in various levels of cervical lesions and comparable or superior analytical sensitivity for the number of HPV copies that could be detected, compared with most other reported methods [Kocjan et al, 2008; Poljak et al, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,90 Cross-reaction was also detected in HC2 with low-risk HPV types (38 samples). Cross-hybridisation with both high-and low-risk HPV types has been reported with HC2, [91][92][93][94] but poses a problem for clinical management especially where HC2 gives a false-positive result. The screening programme 11.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cervical swabs, DNA extraction was performed from 200 µl of non‐denatured Standard Transport Medium (STM) using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), as described previously [Poljak et al, ]. For anal swabs, total DNA was extracted from 500 µl of original sample as described previously [van Doorn et al, ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%