2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papillomavirus E5 suppresses immunity via inhibition of the immunoproteasome and STING pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the relationship between viral infection and dysregulation of protein translation in metastatic expanding clones, we tested for the relative expression levels of translation-initiating factors and regulatory kinases associated with virally activated translational relief, a process by which virally infected cells escape normal anti-viral mechanisms 29,30 . Under normal circumstances, a cell will downregulate protein translation and upregulate apoptosis once a virus is detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To understand the relationship between viral infection and dysregulation of protein translation in metastatic expanding clones, we tested for the relative expression levels of translation-initiating factors and regulatory kinases associated with virally activated translational relief, a process by which virally infected cells escape normal anti-viral mechanisms 29,30 . Under normal circumstances, a cell will downregulate protein translation and upregulate apoptosis once a virus is detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, abundant regulatory T-cells are associated with a more unfavourable prognosis 36 . Viral infection generally results in immune evasion via suppression of IFN-stimulated gene transcription 32 and, in HPV-infection, downregulation of the immunoproteasome 30 . Silencing the IFN regulatory pathway has also been demonstrated to be a feature of metastatic cancer cells 37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, the oncoprotein E7 of high-risk HPV16, which shares a low degree of homology with HPV18 E7, is also responsible for potently suppressing STING-induced immune activation, but does not directly interact with STING [ 160 ]. Instead, HPV16 E5 was demonstrated to directly bind to STING and subsequently inhibit downstream signaling [ 193 ]. However, the exact mechanism via, which HPV16 E5 antagonizes STING is yet to be fully elucidated.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Sting-mediated Immune Evasion By Oncogenic Dna...mentioning
confidence: 99%