Abstract:Science searches, observational studies and clinical trials that reported survival rates of patients with SCCUPHN by HPV status were identified. Meta-analysis estimated the prevalence and prognosis (overall survival, OS; progression-free survival, PFS) of SCCUPHN by HPV status, and compared them to studies of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) from the same institutions and across continents. In 17 SCCUPHN studies (n = 1,149) and 17 institution-matched OPSCC studies (n = 6,522), the pooled HPV preva… Show more
“…The prevalence of CUP in our study was similar to that reported in other studies [10][11][12] as was the prevalence of CUP that were HPV driven. 14 Our observation that serology can identify HPV driven CUP confirms a previous report 15 and is unsurprising as they are likely to represent HPV driven OPC. Our observation that people with HPV driven CUP have improved survival is consistent with that reported in a recent meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…9 A small proportion (<5%) of cancers in the head and neck present as a neck lump with no primary tumour apparent at initial presentation and are referred to as carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). [10][11][12] A substantial proportion of people with CUP have HPV driven tumours 13,14 with an associated strong serological response 15 and better prognosis. [13][14][15][16][17] Furthermore, intensive investigation shows that CUP is often occult OPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] A substantial proportion of people with CUP have HPV driven tumours 13,14 with an associated strong serological response 15 and better prognosis. [13][14][15][16][17] Furthermore, intensive investigation shows that CUP is often occult OPC. 18,19 Some CUP arise in the nasopharynx and may be Epstein Barr virus (EBV) driven.…”
Objectives -To compare risk factors and survival in people with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and cancer unknown primary (CUP).Materials and methods -We recruited 5,511 people with head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2014. We collected data on age, gender, smoking, sexual behaviour, treatment intent, stage, co-morbidity, p16 protein overexpression and biological samples. We assessed human papillomavirus (HPV) status using serological response and p16 immunohistochemistry. We followed up participants to identify those who had died. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate survival and adjust for confounders.Results -Of the 4,843 people with squamous cell cancer 196 had CUPa prevalence of 4.0% (95% CI 3.5% to 4.6%). Of those people with OPC and CUP 69% (1150/1668) and 60% (106/178) respectively had HPV driven tumours. People with HPV driven tumours were likely to be younger, male, non-smokers, with higher stage disease, a history of oral sex and less co-morbidity. People with HPV negative CUP and HPV driven CUP had the survival of people with a stage II/III HPV negative OPC and a stage I/II HPV driven OPC respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for HPV driven OPC and CUP compared with HPV negative OPC and CUP was 0.46 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.59) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.82) respectively. Conclusion -HPV driven CUP is likely to be HPV driven OPC. Identifying effective methods of detecting occult OPC could improve CUP management and allow the detection of early lesions in high risk groups.
“…The prevalence of CUP in our study was similar to that reported in other studies [10][11][12] as was the prevalence of CUP that were HPV driven. 14 Our observation that serology can identify HPV driven CUP confirms a previous report 15 and is unsurprising as they are likely to represent HPV driven OPC. Our observation that people with HPV driven CUP have improved survival is consistent with that reported in a recent meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…9 A small proportion (<5%) of cancers in the head and neck present as a neck lump with no primary tumour apparent at initial presentation and are referred to as carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). [10][11][12] A substantial proportion of people with CUP have HPV driven tumours 13,14 with an associated strong serological response 15 and better prognosis. [13][14][15][16][17] Furthermore, intensive investigation shows that CUP is often occult OPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] A substantial proportion of people with CUP have HPV driven tumours 13,14 with an associated strong serological response 15 and better prognosis. [13][14][15][16][17] Furthermore, intensive investigation shows that CUP is often occult OPC. 18,19 Some CUP arise in the nasopharynx and may be Epstein Barr virus (EBV) driven.…”
Objectives -To compare risk factors and survival in people with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and cancer unknown primary (CUP).Materials and methods -We recruited 5,511 people with head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2014. We collected data on age, gender, smoking, sexual behaviour, treatment intent, stage, co-morbidity, p16 protein overexpression and biological samples. We assessed human papillomavirus (HPV) status using serological response and p16 immunohistochemistry. We followed up participants to identify those who had died. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate survival and adjust for confounders.Results -Of the 4,843 people with squamous cell cancer 196 had CUPa prevalence of 4.0% (95% CI 3.5% to 4.6%). Of those people with OPC and CUP 69% (1150/1668) and 60% (106/178) respectively had HPV driven tumours. People with HPV driven tumours were likely to be younger, male, non-smokers, with higher stage disease, a history of oral sex and less co-morbidity. People with HPV negative CUP and HPV driven CUP had the survival of people with a stage II/III HPV negative OPC and a stage I/II HPV driven OPC respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for HPV driven OPC and CUP compared with HPV negative OPC and CUP was 0.46 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.59) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.82) respectively. Conclusion -HPV driven CUP is likely to be HPV driven OPC. Identifying effective methods of detecting occult OPC could improve CUP management and allow the detection of early lesions in high risk groups.
“…In most studies, baseline biomarkers are evaluated for their prognostic role for disease outcomes (regardless of treatment), reflected by critical clinical trial endpoints. Key endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), disease‐free survival (DFS), loco‐regional (LR) control, and distant metastasis‐free survival …”
Section: Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkersmentioning
Background
Biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) emerge rapidly in recent years, especially for new targeted therapies and immunotherapies.
Methods
Recent, relevant peer‐reviewed evidence were critically reviewed and summarized.
Results
This review article briefly introduces essential biomarker concepts, including purposes and classifications (predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic markers), and the phases of biomarker development. We summarize current biomarkers in order of clinical utility; p16 and human papillomavirus status remain the most important and validated biomarkers in HNSCC. The rationale for biomarker study design continues to evolve with technological advances, especially whole‐exome or whole‐genomic sequencing. Noninvasive body fluid and liquid biopsy biomarkers appear to hold strong potential for development as tools for early cancer detection, cancer diagnosis, monitoring of disease recurrence, and outcome prediction. In light of discrepancies among different technologies, standardized approaches are needed.
Conclusion
Biomarkers from cancer tissue or blood in HNSCC could direct new anticancer therapies.
“…В Англии рак полости рта ежегодно увеличивался на 2,8% у мужчин и на 3,0% у женщин [3]. Рак орофарингеальной области является восьмой причиной смерти от рака во всем мире [4,5]. Для пациентов с карциномой орофарингеальной области ранней стадии характерна достаточно высокая пятилетняя выживаемость -82,4% [6].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.