2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papilloma virus testing in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: What the clinician should know

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
91
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other methods have been developed, 3 to directly or indirectly identify HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but none of them are ideal ( Table 1). Detection of HPV-DNA can be performed by PCR or in situ hybridization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several other methods have been developed, 3 to directly or indirectly identify HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but none of them are ideal ( Table 1). Detection of HPV-DNA can be performed by PCR or in situ hybridization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of HPV-DNA can be performed by PCR or in situ hybridization. PCR is highly sensitive but lacks specificity, as it cannot distinguish between an infection truly involved in carcinogenesis and a bystander oral HPV infection, 3,4 which is not uncommon in the general population. 5 On the other hand, detection of HPV-DNA by in situ hybridization has good specificity, as the virus is directly visualized within the tumor cell nuclei, but several authors have noted a lack of sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The essay for HPV RNAscope® is designed to detect the mRNA of E6/E7 of high-risk HPV genotypes (e.g. HPV 16,18,31,33,35,52 and 58) using a pool of probes specifi c for these genotypes [32][33][34].…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, it is believed that the prevalence of HPV in OPSCC ranges from 50% to 80% at the world level, with sharp variations depending on the study population and the geographical location. However, these estimates could be inaccurate, since the methods of detection are still extremely variable among different laboratories and most of those currently used for screening purposes does not say whether the virus is transcriptionally active in tumors [35].…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%