2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 require intact Fc effector functions for optimal therapeutic protection

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 has caused the global COVID-19 pandemic. Although passively delivered neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 show promise in clinical trials, their mechanism of action in vivo is incompletely understood. Here we define correlates of protection of neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in SARS-CoV-2-infected animals. Whereas Fc effector functions are dispensable when representative neutralizing mAbs are administered as prophylaxis, they are required for optimal pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

24
254
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(119 reference statements)
24
254
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An S/C of 9 on the Ortho Clinical assay correlated to a neutralizing titer of ~1:100. This is notably similar to the neutralizing titer of 1:104 we found to be sufficient to reduce weight loss in mice (23). Nevertheless, the neutralizing assay used in this study cannot be assumed to perform similarly to the assay used in the BARDA study (14,15) due to non-standardization of SARS-CoV-2 strains, cell lines, and reagents/procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…An S/C of 9 on the Ortho Clinical assay correlated to a neutralizing titer of ~1:100. This is notably similar to the neutralizing titer of 1:104 we found to be sufficient to reduce weight loss in mice (23). Nevertheless, the neutralizing assay used in this study cannot be assumed to perform similarly to the assay used in the BARDA study (14,15) due to non-standardization of SARS-CoV-2 strains, cell lines, and reagents/procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Despite observing differences in serum neutralizing activity against authentic SARS-CoV-2 variant viruses, it remains unclear how this finding translates into effects on protection in the context of secondary infection or infection after vaccination with platforms using historical spike gene sequences. Although serum neutralizing titers are an anticipated correlate of protection 37 , this measurement does not account for Fc effector functions; Fcγ receptor or complement protein engagement by non, weakly, or strongly neutralizing antibodies that bind the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on the surface of infected cells could confer substantial protection [38][39][40] . Also, the role of memory T or B cells in protection against variant viruses is unknown and could prevent severe infection even in the setting of compromised serum antibody responses [41][42][43] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, FcγR engagement mediates pleiotropic antiviral immune functions, including the clearance of viral particles 9,10 , the cytotoxic elimination of virus-infected cells 11 , as well as the induction of protective T cell responses that contribute to antiviral immunity [12][13][14] . In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, a growing body of experimental evidence from various animal disease models supports that Fc-FcγR interactions are essential for the in vivo antiviral activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, as loss of the capacity of the Fc domain of these mAbs to engage FcγRs is associated with reduced antiviral activity in vivo [15][16][17][18] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%