2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11111-018-0309-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human mobility and environmental change: a survey of perceptions and policy direction

Abstract: Research concerning human mobility in the context of environmental change is primarily focused on analyses of the nexus itself. We have taken a less-travelled route, focusing on those who take an interest in the issue, engage with it professionally or seek to address the multitude of social, economic and political dimensions associated with it. We used an online survey to examine perceptions of the human mobility/environmental change nexus amongst those who work with or within it (n = 262 respondents), situati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important consideration in understanding and promoting framing in the context of climate displacement is that there might be tensions between frames preferred by international organizations, NGOs, and national governments-such as human rights frames-and those which are prevalent within local, customary forms of law and justice (Arnall Alex and McKinnon 2019). Especially, with the apparent research, domination in the field urgently needs to be supplemented by more integration across various professional settings like research, the public sector, national government, NGO, media, and private sector (Thornton et al 2018). This paper generates new insights that indeed there are different preferred frames by expanding the partnering with participants from two professional settings: research and the national government.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important consideration in understanding and promoting framing in the context of climate displacement is that there might be tensions between frames preferred by international organizations, NGOs, and national governments-such as human rights frames-and those which are prevalent within local, customary forms of law and justice (Arnall Alex and McKinnon 2019). Especially, with the apparent research, domination in the field urgently needs to be supplemented by more integration across various professional settings like research, the public sector, national government, NGO, media, and private sector (Thornton et al 2018). This paper generates new insights that indeed there are different preferred frames by expanding the partnering with participants from two professional settings: research and the national government.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to move freely and easily. This is the umbrella term for movement and includes a spectrum of varying degrees of agency (e.g., forced displacement, migration, voluntary tourism) (Thornton et al, 2019;Warner, 2012).…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, narratives of climate apocalypse, fear, and risk are ushering in a deeply problematic landscape of segregation, securitization, and redefinition of citizenship (Chaturvedi and Doyle, 2015; Davoudi, 2014). The issues of citizenship and migration in the era of climate change bring about questions of mobility and relocation (Adger et al., 2015; Thornton et al., 2019), refugee status and asylum (Berchin et al., 2017; Berglund, 2019), and increasing anti-immigration sentiment and militarization of borders (Dawson, 2017; Gupta, 2009; Turhan and Armiero, 2019). This means that citizenship and climate apartheid are linked through formal state recognition (or denial) of a set of rights and freedoms, especially as they relate to mobility and inclusion.…”
Section: Evidence Of Emerging Climate Apartheidmentioning
confidence: 99%