2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/sice.2006.315259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Machine System Simulation for Supporting the Design and Evaluation of Reliable Aircraft Cockpit Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the evaluation methods for human-computer interaction systems for special vehicles are mainly qualitative analysis from the perspectives of ergonomics and ergonomics. Karikawa [1] et al built a pilot cognitive simulation system to qualitatively evaluate the information content of the aircraft cockpit man-machine interface design through the pilot's cognitive process. Yu [2] et al combined the characteristics of the human-machine interface with complex equipment and humanmachine-environment system theory, and proposed the design principle of human-machine interface for complex equipment as human nature, safety, efficiency, economy, comfort and overall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the evaluation methods for human-computer interaction systems for special vehicles are mainly qualitative analysis from the perspectives of ergonomics and ergonomics. Karikawa [1] et al built a pilot cognitive simulation system to qualitatively evaluate the information content of the aircraft cockpit man-machine interface design through the pilot's cognitive process. Yu [2] et al combined the characteristics of the human-machine interface with complex equipment and humanmachine-environment system theory, and proposed the design principle of human-machine interface for complex equipment as human nature, safety, efficiency, economy, comfort and overall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-designed aircraft cockpit is conducive to the pilot's situational awareness and control of an aircraft system to complete the task securely, so comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics is of great significance to evaluate and validate the aircraft system design. Current researches evaluate the cockpit ergonomics mainly from the aspects of situational awareness and pilots' workload [1,2], and major research methods used in literature are questionnaire surveys and simulations. Survey methods collect the subjective judgements from domain experts and discuss the merits of the schemes by using questionnaire inventories; such approaches include cooper-harper (CH) rating, subject workload assessment technique (SWAT), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load indexes (NASA-TLX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from all the primary flight information, the PFD could also be configured to display ILS, glideslope indicators, and altitude indicator QFE settings. Although a new pilot may have difficulty in assessing all the information shown by a PFD at first glance, proper training and flight experience may help the pilot to grasp all the displayed information at a single glance[39][40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%