2016
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aai7677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human lymphoid organ dendritic cell identity is predominantly dictated by ontogeny, not tissue microenvironment

Abstract: In mice, conventional and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) derive from separate hematopoietic precursors before they migrate to peripheral tissues. Moreover, two classes of conventional DCs (cDC1 and cDC2 DCs) and one class of plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) have been shown to be transcriptionally and functionally distinct entities. In humans, these three DC subtypes can be identified using the cell surface markers CD1c (cDC2), CD141 (cDC1), and CD303 (pDCs), albeit it remains elusive whether DC functionality is mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
151
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(147 reference statements)
8
151
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional and anatomical classification of DC as ‘migratory tissue DC’ or ‘lymph node resident DC’ remains useful to define context. However, comparative gene expression studies have driven a robust classification of DC based primarily on lineage, that correlates with the differential expression of key transcription factors such as interferon regulatory factors 8 and 4 (IRF8 and IRF4) and performs well across all mammalian species . This recognizes plasmacytoid DC (pDC) and two types of ‘conventional’ or ‘classical’ DC (cDC) corresponding to the two subsets of myeloid DC previously defined by CD141 and CD1c expression in humans .…”
Section: The Unified Classification Of Mammalian DCmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The functional and anatomical classification of DC as ‘migratory tissue DC’ or ‘lymph node resident DC’ remains useful to define context. However, comparative gene expression studies have driven a robust classification of DC based primarily on lineage, that correlates with the differential expression of key transcription factors such as interferon regulatory factors 8 and 4 (IRF8 and IRF4) and performs well across all mammalian species . This recognizes plasmacytoid DC (pDC) and two types of ‘conventional’ or ‘classical’ DC (cDC) corresponding to the two subsets of myeloid DC previously defined by CD141 and CD1c expression in humans .…”
Section: The Unified Classification Of Mammalian DCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original markers, CD141 and CD1c have limitations as both are induced on cDC and monocyte‐derived cells in tissues and in culture. Expression profiling has now provided a suite of more consistent markers that perform well across species, such as CLEC9A, CADM1, BTLA and CD26 for CD141 + myeloid cDC1, and CD2, Fc ε R1 and SIRPA for CD1c + myeloid cDC2 (Table ). Additional complexity discussed below is the emergence of subsets of cDC2 and the realization that conventional pDC gates include myeloid cDC precursors that also express CD123 and CD303 …”
Section: The Unified Classification Of Mammalian DCmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Human CD141 + and CD1c + cDCs were originally identified in blood (Dzionek et al, 2000), and have been ontogenetically aligned to mouse cDC1 and cDC2, respectively (Bachem et al, 2010; Crozat et al, 2010; Jongbloed et al, 2010; Poulin et al, 2010). Human DC subsets have been characterized in tissues (Guilliams et al, 2016; Haniffa et al, 2012; Heidkamp et al, 2016; Watchmaker et al, 2014), however, tissues were derived from isolated surgical explants from a small number of individuals at different life stages. The ability to adapt DC therapies to the diverse human population requires a comprehensive analysis of DC populations in multiple tissues at different life stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%