2018
DOI: 10.1101/359018
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-level saccade detection performance using deep neural networks

Abstract: Saccades are ballistic eye movements that rapidly shift gaze from one location of visual space to another. Detecting saccades in eye movement recordings is important not only for studying the neural mechanisms underlying sensory, motor, and cognitive processes, but also as a clinical and diagnostic tool. However, automatically detecting saccades can be difficult, particularly when such saccades are generated in coordination with other tracking eye movements, like smooth pursuits, or when the saccade amplitude … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed eye movements in all trials. We detected saccades using established methods 41, 75 , and we manually inspected all trials to correct for mis-detections. In experiments requiring a saccade (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed eye movements in all trials. We detected saccades using established methods 41, 75 , and we manually inspected all trials to correct for mis-detections. In experiments requiring a saccade (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then detected catch-up saccades using velocity and acceleration criteria (Chen and 270 Hafed 2013;Hafed et al 2009;Krauzlis and Miles 1996), and we manually inspected all 271 movements to correct for misses or false detections. For a subset of the data, we used 272 instead a novel state-of-the-art machine-learning approach for saccade detection using 273 convolutional neural networks, which we have recently developed (Bellet et al 2018). 274…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our test battery tests smooth pursuit in a formal way and in this paper we analyze smooth pursuit using a formal model as well. This is indebted due to the current lack of applicable smooth pursuit detection algorithms (Pekkanen and Lappi, 2017; Bellet et al, 2018, but see recent exceptions). We think that the smooth pursuit findings should be treated with caution as our analysis might not generalize to more natural conditions and we had a high number of catch-up saccades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%