2018
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/75174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Impact on Spatial Water Temperature Variability in Lowland Rivers: a Case Study from Central Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature below the reservoir in summer months was lower or equal to the value measured above the reservoir. Łaszewski et al in 2018 showed that in the summer months, the temperature below the reservoir is higher than above the reservoir, which is at variance with the study results. It should be emphasised, however, that the Utrata in front of the reservoir in Komorów is not a regulated river.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Temperature below the reservoir in summer months was lower or equal to the value measured above the reservoir. Łaszewski et al in 2018 showed that in the summer months, the temperature below the reservoir is higher than above the reservoir, which is at variance with the study results. It should be emphasised, however, that the Utrata in front of the reservoir in Komorów is not a regulated river.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Seasonal changes in water temperature were generally closely related to the air temperature pattern [75,76]; however, the results should be treated with caution due to the clear diurnal water temperature dynamics observed in rivers and streams [77] which the grab sampling method does not take into account. Nevertheless, attention could be paid to the Da ńków stream (site T5), which was characterized by a lower annual temperature range compared to other sites.…”
Section: Relationships Between Precipitation and Biogenic Concentrations And Between Chemical Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Consequently, sites represent catchments with a diverse area (ranging from 35.6 to 854 km 2 ), mean slope, land cover, as well as morphometric parameters of the channel and riparian shading. However, due to the urbanization of the catchments, some of the measurement sites (R3, R8, and R9) deliberately reflect different anthropogenic influences (Somorowska and Łaszewski 2017;Łaszewski 2018). Sites in the TR scale, with the catchment area ranging from 2.9 to 24.3 km 2 , were selected with a view to maximizing differences between catchment and channel properties, while their localization precluded direct anthropogenic modification of their thermal regime; moreover, an important criterion was whether these streams were permanently flowing during the summer period.…”
Section: Field Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%