2017
DOI: 10.1177/0959683616683257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human impact on small-mammal diversity during the middle- to late-Holocene in Iberia: The case of El Mirador cave (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain)

Abstract: The human impact on the environment in the Holocene has usually been characterized on the basis of palaeobotanical records, but attempts to distinguish the anthropogenic impact from natural events in landscape evolution have been the subject of much debate in recent years. The aim of this paper is to analyse small-mammal diversity and the presence of synanthropic species, whose small size makes them more sensitive to any changes in their environment that may occur. This study has allowed us to characterize pal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These taphonomic modifications show relative higher percentages in MIR4 than in MIR5, indicating slightly more humid conditions in the former than in the latter level. The palaeoenvironmental evidence provided by the small mammal taxonomy from MIR5 indicates humid conditions in this level, supported by an increase in open dry landscapes together with a decreased in precipitation values from MIR5 to MIR4 (Bañuls-Cardona et al, 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These taphonomic modifications show relative higher percentages in MIR4 than in MIR5, indicating slightly more humid conditions in the former than in the latter level. The palaeoenvironmental evidence provided by the small mammal taxonomy from MIR5 indicates humid conditions in this level, supported by an increase in open dry landscapes together with a decreased in precipitation values from MIR5 to MIR4 (Bañuls-Cardona et al, 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to these authors, in the absence of more profitable prey items, the diet of the eagle owls is mainly composed by microtines, which usually make up 30%–80% of prey numbers (Mikkola, 1983). A detailed inspection of the small mammal species recorded at MIR4 and MIR5 indicates that microtines represent the 54.17% and 79.78% of the prey items, respectively (Bañuls-Cardona et al, 2017a, 2017b; Table 1). Although it is claimed that eagle owls show a generalist feeding behaviour, it is necessary to carefully considered two main biases in its prey assemblages: nocturnal animals are taken more commonly due to its time of hunting activity and animals living in the more open and wetter parts of the owl’s hunting range may be over-represented (Andrews, 1990; Mikkola, 1983; Olsson, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations