2008
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01004-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Types 1 and 2 Exhibit Comparable Sensitivities to Zidovudine and Other Nucleoside Analog Inhibitors In Vitro

Abstract: Using an indicator cell assay that directly quantifies viral replication, we show that human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively) exhibit similar sensitivities to 3-azido-3-deoxythymidine (zidovudine) as well as other nucleoside analog inhibitors of reverse transcriptase. These data support the use of nucleoside analogs for antiviral therapy of HIV-2 infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the overall sensitivity of HIV-2 to NRTIs, some articles have suggested that HIV-2 may be naturally resistant to certain NRTIs such as zidovudine (ZDV) (41). However, a recent study claimed that HIV-1 and HIV-2 display comparable sensitivities to ZDV and other NRTIs in vitro (48).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the overall sensitivity of HIV-2 to NRTIs, some articles have suggested that HIV-2 may be naturally resistant to certain NRTIs such as zidovudine (ZDV) (41). However, a recent study claimed that HIV-1 and HIV-2 display comparable sensitivities to ZDV and other NRTIs in vitro (48).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that these isolates exhibit comparable susceptibilities to FDAapproved NRTIs in the MAGIC-5A cell line, with EC 50 s that differ by 2-fold or less between the two strains (53). In the present study, we performed a total of 10 independent assay runs in which the sensitivity of HIV-1 NL4-3 and HIV-2 ROD9 to MK-8591 was tested head-to-head (e.g., Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the assay protocol has been provided elsewhere (32). Importantly, this methodology directly quantifies antiviral activity in a single round of HIV infection (as opposed to measuring virus-induced cell death or viral protein release following multiple rounds of HIV replication), and the resultant EC 50 s are not affected by strain-specific differences in replication rate, infectivity, cytopathic potential, or cell-to-cell spread (32,53,54). The 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC 50 ) for MK-8591 in MAGIC-5A cells was Ͼ100 nM, as determined using the CellTiter Glo assay (Promega) (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both 3TC and ZDV have activity against different subtypes of wild-type HIV-1 and both are also active against HIV-2, although the effectiveness in HIV-2 infected patients is not fully established. [13][14][15] The in vitro 50% effective concentration (EC 50 ) against HIV-1 is approximately 1 μM (230 ng/mL) for 3TC and 0.01 μM (2.7 ng/mL) for ZDV, but several factors influence this value such as the cell-type used for the assay and the subtype of HIV-1 or HIV-2 studied. 8 As one measure of potency in vivo, ZDV monotherapy reduces HIV-RNA in plasma of antiretroviral naïve individuals by about 0.85 log 10 copies/mL whereas 3TC monotherapy reduces plasma HIV-RNA by about 1.5 log 10 copies/mL.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pharmacologic Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%