2020
DOI: 10.3201/eid2603.190206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Immune Responses to Melioidosis and Cross-Reactivity to Low-Virulence Burkholderia Species, Thailand1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), which is the serological standard test for melioidosis in many endemic regions, whose sensitivity might be as low as 56%, and is commonly positive in the endemic population [27][28][29]. There is known cross-reactivity of antibody and cellular responses to B. pseudomallei and environmental Burkholderia species of low pathogenicity in both melioidosis patients and endemic controls [30], so the development of a diagnostic test for acute melioidosis with high specificity is highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), which is the serological standard test for melioidosis in many endemic regions, whose sensitivity might be as low as 56%, and is commonly positive in the endemic population [27][28][29]. There is known cross-reactivity of antibody and cellular responses to B. pseudomallei and environmental Burkholderia species of low pathogenicity in both melioidosis patients and endemic controls [30], so the development of a diagnostic test for acute melioidosis with high specificity is highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6% of healthy controls exhibited strong cellular responses to Hcp1 and TssM. This may be a result of repeated environmental exposure to B. pseudomallei or successful clearance of B. pseudomallei after exposure (37,38). In previous studies, there was no difference in IFN-g production by PBMC from melioidosis patients versus healthy controls upon stimulation with cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and influenza virus (CEF) peptide pool which is a positive control for CD8 + T cell functionality (26,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It has been previously reported that CD4 + , CD8 + and NK cells from melioidosis patients are sources of IFN-g production following stimulation with B. pseudomallei proteins such as LolC, OppA and PotF or whole bacteria (27,37,39). Similar to our study, Rongkard et al reported that acute melioidosis patients predominantly exhibited IFN-g production from CD4 + T cells when stimulated with culture filtrate antigens from B. pseudomallei (37). CD4 + T cells, but not CD8 + T cells have also previously been shown to be important in mediating immunity against B. pseudomallei infections using depletion studies in a murine model (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, elevated interferon gamma (IFN-γ) responses associated with CD4 + and CD8 + T cells are important to combat the disease ( 15 ). Moreover, IFN-γ-producing natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cells also participate in the response against melioidosis in mice ( 17 ) and humans ( 18 , 19 ). Finally, humoral immunity also contributes to the elimination of B. pseudomallei in mice, and protective antibody responses have been described in human observational studies ( 20 , 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%