2005
DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-3788com
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human HIF‐3α4 is a dominant‐negative regulator of HIF‐1 and is down‐regulated in renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: A universal response to changes in cellular oxygen tension is governed by a family of heterodimeric transcription factors called hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). Tumor hypoxia, as well as various cancer-causing mutations, has been shown to elevate the level of HIF-1alpha, signifying a critical role of the HIF pathway in cancer development. The recently identified third member of the human HIF-alpha family, HIF-3alpha, produces multiple splice variants that contain extra DNA binding elements and protein-protein … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
143
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Briefly, first-strand cDNA synthesis was performed as follows: 1 ml of oligo(dT) 23 primer (Sigma, St Louis, MI, USA) was incubated with 5 mg of RNA and dH 2 O (total reaction volume was 20 ml) for 10 min at 701C in a thermal cycler (MJ research, Boston, MA, USA). The mixture was cooled to 41C, at which time 4 ml of 5 Â first-strand reaction buffer, 2 ml of 0.1 M DTT, 1 ml of 10 mM dNTPs and 1 ml Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were added.…”
Section: Rna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Briefly, first-strand cDNA synthesis was performed as follows: 1 ml of oligo(dT) 23 primer (Sigma, St Louis, MI, USA) was incubated with 5 mg of RNA and dH 2 O (total reaction volume was 20 ml) for 10 min at 701C in a thermal cycler (MJ research, Boston, MA, USA). The mixture was cooled to 41C, at which time 4 ml of 5 Â first-strand reaction buffer, 2 ml of 0.1 M DTT, 1 ml of 10 mM dNTPs and 1 ml Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were added.…”
Section: Rna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIF-3a differs from HIF-1a and HIF-2a in both its protein structure and its effect on gene expression. HIF-3a was previously believed to mainly function by opposing hypoxiainduced HIF-1a-and HIF-2a-dependent gene expression (15,16). Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-3a competes with HIF-1a and HIF-2a for binding to the promoter region of their target genes and thus negatively regulates gene expression (14,15,17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have distinct or even opposite functions when tested by overexpression approaches [35]. For instance, while the full-length human HIF3α-1 can stimulate HRE-dependent reporter construct activity and upregulate unique target genes [8,12], human HIF3α-4 isoform, a shorter isoform that lacks the TAD domain, inhibits the activity of HIF-1α and HIF-2α [11,60] in a similar manner as mouse IPAS was shown to inhibit HIF-1α activity [9].…”
Section: Post-transcriptional Modification By Alternative Splicingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But while it has been clearly established that HIF1α and HIF2α function as master regulators of the response to hypoxia and are critical regulators of tumorigenesis, the roles played by HIF3α under hypoxia and in cancer biology are far less clear. The reasons of this reside not only on the initial discovery of a large array of HIF3α variants which has posed enormous challenges to study HIF3α-mediated physiological roles, but mainly on the prevailing view of HIF3α as a negative regulator of HIF1α and HIF2α actions, on the basis of the initial finding that two of its variants, lacking transactivation domains, act as negative regulators of HIF1α and HIF2α transactivating gene functions [9][10][11]. However, this dogma was refuted in 2014 by Zhang et al [12], which demonstrated that HIF3α functions as a transcriptional activator in zebrafish embryos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%