2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human health risk ​and receptor model-oriented sources of heavy metal pollution in commonly consume vegetable and fish species of high Ganges river floodplain agro-ecological area, Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result showed that Cu concentration in all freshwater fish samples were below the permissible limit 4.5 mg/kg [ 35 ]. The average Cu concentration of fish species was 4.71 mg/kg in western part of Bangladesh [ 36 ]. The Cu concentration was 7.089 mg/kg [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result showed that Cu concentration in all freshwater fish samples were below the permissible limit 4.5 mg/kg [ 35 ]. The average Cu concentration of fish species was 4.71 mg/kg in western part of Bangladesh [ 36 ]. The Cu concentration was 7.089 mg/kg [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-method source analysis could derive the imprecise evaluation of contamination sources, leading to the disputation of the reliability of model results. Therefore, it is advantageous to apply multiple receptor models to achieve reliable source identification and apportionment [ 62 , 63 ]. All multivariate analysis methods identified the common origin of Cd, Zn, and Pb, likely from a steel production plant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDIs of the potentially toxic elements were calculated using the following equation [ 21 ]: where E f is exposure frequency (365 days/year), E D is the exposure duration (72.3 years, the average life span for Bangladeshi [ 22 ]), F IR is the average food (rice) consumption (328.9 g/person/day [ 23 ]), C M is the metal concentration (mg/kg fresh weight (fw)), B W is the average body weight for an adult (60 kg), T A is the average exposure time (365 days × number of exposure years, i.e., 72.3 years in this case).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target cancer risk has been computed using the formula from Chakraborty et al [ 21 ] as follows: where TCR is the target cancer risk over a lifetime, EDI is the estimated daily metal intake of the population (mg/kg/day) and CSFo is the oral cancer slope factor in (mg/kg/day) -1 . The CSFo values for As and Pb has been taken as 1.5 (mg/kg/day) -1 and 8.5 × 10 −3 (mg/kg/day) -1 , respectively from the Integrated Risk Information System database [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%