2014
DOI: 10.3201/eid2012.131886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Hantavirus Infections in the Netherlands

Abstract: We report the recent epidemiology and estimated seroprevalence of human hantavirus infections in the Netherlands. Sixty-two cases were reported during December 2008–December 2013. The estimated seroprevalence in the screened municipalities in 2006–2007 was 1.7% (95% CI 1.3%–2.3%). Findings suggest that hantavirus infections are underdiagnosed in the Netherlands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present seroprevalence of PUUV (0.4%; 95%CI 0.1–2.3%) is comparable to the seroprevalence estimated in the Dutch (1.7%; 95%CI 1.3–2.3%), Belgian (1.5%) and German (1–3%) general population [1416]. The only orthohantavirus found in our study was identified as PUUV which is believed to cause the majority of human orthohantavirus infections in the Netherlands [14], and is associated with bank voles ( Myodes glareolus ). Contact with mice was less often reported by muskrat and coypu trappers than contact with rats, and could explain a similar seroprevalence as found in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The present seroprevalence of PUUV (0.4%; 95%CI 0.1–2.3%) is comparable to the seroprevalence estimated in the Dutch (1.7%; 95%CI 1.3–2.3%), Belgian (1.5%) and German (1–3%) general population [1416]. The only orthohantavirus found in our study was identified as PUUV which is believed to cause the majority of human orthohantavirus infections in the Netherlands [14], and is associated with bank voles ( Myodes glareolus ). Contact with mice was less often reported by muskrat and coypu trappers than contact with rats, and could explain a similar seroprevalence as found in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The Sindbis virus (SINV) transmitted to humans from its enzootic hosts by mosquitoes, and causes polyarthritis, fever, and rash [23,24] Hantaviruses have almost entirely been associated with human contact with rodent excrement, although recent human-to-human transmission has been reported for the Andes virus in South America. Hantavirus's types cause potentially fatal diseases in humans, such as haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome; however, others have not been associated with human disease [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this lineage, there was a clear geographically based clustering of the Dutch PUUV sequences; strains obtained from four locations in the region Noord-Brabant (locations B-E) clustered together but separately from the strain detected in bank voles in the Twente region (location A). Both regions are known to be endemic for NE, with most human cases reported from Twente (Goeijenbier et al, 2014;Sane et al, 2014;Schimmer, 2008). As the rodents were trapped at locations where specific human cases were residing or working, our observations indicate that these cases might …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annually, four to 24 human hantavirus cases were reported in the Netherlands in the period 2009(Sane et al, 2014, of which the majority were in the eastern and southern parts of the country, indicated in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation