2014
DOI: 10.1177/0309132514521482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human geography and archaeology

Abstract: This essay explores the scope for greater engagement between human geographers and archaeologists, by taking a first step towards identifying convergences in theoretical development and possible topics for dialogue. Focusing on cultural geography and contemporary archaeology, I examine the changing role of matter and time within the field of archaeology. In doing so, I reflect on the opportunities for dialogue that are opened up as archaeologists rethink a series of ideas that have for many years remained fund… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By avoiding a binary division between past and present, in 'symmetrical archaeology pasts are regarded as not exclusively past. Instead, [this field] seeks to uncover pleats and folds in the fabric of time' (Hill, 2015). This approach to time is shared with recent work in heritage studies (Waterton and Dittmer, 2014) and is also our approach here.…”
Section: Folding Time At the Relational Museummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By avoiding a binary division between past and present, in 'symmetrical archaeology pasts are regarded as not exclusively past. Instead, [this field] seeks to uncover pleats and folds in the fabric of time' (Hill, 2015). This approach to time is shared with recent work in heritage studies (Waterton and Dittmer, 2014) and is also our approach here.…”
Section: Folding Time At the Relational Museummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing upon their embeddedness in their subject areas, I suggest, working‐class scholars could use their positionalities and experiences to investigate the affective affordances of ruination from fresh embodied perspectives. Yet, whilst I acknowledge that the “always already affective nature of matter and the material opens up opportunities to think through the role of past in the present from an entirely novel perspective” (Hill, , p. 419), I contend that the study of industrial ruins, and industrial ruination more broadly, would also benefit from more attentive and thorough historical investigations.…”
Section: Reading Deindustrialized Landscapes and Materialities Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her 2015 Progress in Human Geography piece, Lisa Hill stresses that the time is ripe for an increased dialogue between human geography and archaeology, particularly in relation to issues of matter and time. While Hill’s report centres on the relations between contemporary archaeology and cultural geography, the foundations are laid, through the notion of the ‘archaeological imagination’, for drawing new lines of intersection between archaeology and historical(-cultural) geography.…”
Section: Soil and The ‘Archaeological Imagination’mentioning
confidence: 99%