2016
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human genetic variation database, a reference database of genetic variations in the Japanese population

Abstract: Whole-genome and -exome resequencing using next-generation sequencers is a powerful approach for identifying genomic variations that are associated with diseases. However, systematic strategies for prioritizing causative variants from many candidates to explain the disease phenotype are still far from being established, because the population-specific frequency spectrum of genetic variation has not been characterized. Here, we have collected exomic genetic variation from 1208 Japanese individuals through a col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
210
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
210
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonsynonymous SNVs, splice‐site variants and indels were retained. We excluded variants present in the 1000 Genomes database, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500), the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database version 0.3 (all and East Asian populations), and the Human Genetic Variation Database (HGVD)18, 19 to discover rare de novo variants. For the autosomal recessive and X‐linked models, we excluded variants with an allele frequency equal to or greater than 1% in the 1000 Genomes database, the Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) 6500, the ExAC database version 0.3 (all and East Asian populations) and the HGVD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsynonymous SNVs, splice‐site variants and indels were retained. We excluded variants present in the 1000 Genomes database, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500), the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database version 0.3 (all and East Asian populations), and the Human Genetic Variation Database (HGVD)18, 19 to discover rare de novo variants. For the autosomal recessive and X‐linked models, we excluded variants with an allele frequency equal to or greater than 1% in the 1000 Genomes database, the Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) 6500, the ExAC database version 0.3 (all and East Asian populations) and the HGVD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale genome sequencing of volunteers from general residents provides valuable data for the field of medical genomics; however, whole genome sequencing (WGS) or whole exome sequencing (WES) [6,7] may uncover other clinically relevant variants in addition to specific findings intended by a particular project. Therefore, it raises an important problem: how can researchers use and manage secondary findings, which may be deliberately sought, or incidental findings (accidental discoveries) from WGS or WES studies?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutation frequencies of cancer types and minor allele frequencies (MAFs) detected are listed in Table 3. The MAFs of the variants did not differ significantly from those of normal subjects listed in the public database (Higasa et al, 2016;Yamaguchi-Kabata et al, 2015), suggesting that WES is useful for the comprehensive detection of germline mutations. Only the allele frequency of CDA (rs60369023) differed significantly from that in the public database, which is almost consistent with the results of another study (our calculated MAF was 0.028 compared to 0.022) (Sugiyama et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The allele frequencies of each gene were compared with those obtained from public databases, the Human Genetic Variation Database (HGVD) (Higasa et al, 2016) or the Integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database (iJGVD) (Yamaguchi-Kabata et al, 2015).…”
Section: Whole Exome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%