2021
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.16924102.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Gait-labeling Uncertainty and a Hybrid Model for Gait Segmentation

Abstract: <div><div><div><p>Motion capture systems are widely accepted as ground-truth for gait analysis and are used for the validation of other gait analysis systems.To date, their reliability and limitations in manual labeling of gait events have not been studied.</p><p><b>Objectives</b>: Evaluate human manual labeling uncertainty and introduce a new hybrid gait analysis model for long-term monitoring.</p><p><b>Methods</b>: Evaluate and estimate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 In addition, the algorithm only uses three signals to classify the gait phases, all of which come from a single gyroscope only. This reduces the amount of information used to characterize the gait cycle compared to the studies that use both gyroscope and accelerometers [31], and thus saves the energy and the cost of the wearable device. Moreover, no prior calibration is required for the sensor data, which is a significant improvement compared to other studies that need additional calibration procedures [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 In addition, the algorithm only uses three signals to classify the gait phases, all of which come from a single gyroscope only. This reduces the amount of information used to characterize the gait cycle compared to the studies that use both gyroscope and accelerometers [31], and thus saves the energy and the cost of the wearable device. Moreover, no prior calibration is required for the sensor data, which is a significant improvement compared to other studies that need additional calibration procedures [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait phases were labeled by a rule-based detection algorithm, which has been validated with the motion capture system and shows high accuracy [31]. Most importantly, it is not constrained by the lab environment and can label outdoor walking data at any time and anywhere for real-time algorithm validation.…”
Section: Data Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the algorithm only uses three signals to classify the gait phases, all of which come from a single gyroscope only. This reduces the amount of information used to characterize the gait cycle compared to the studies that use both gyroscope and accelerometers [22], and thus saves the energy and the cost of the wearable device. Moreover, no prior calibration is required for the sensor data, which is a significant improvement compared to the studies that need additional calibration procedures [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of free walking strides collected for real-time algorithm validation is around 50000. Gait phases were labeled by a rule-based detection algorithm, which has been validated with the motion capture system and shows high accuracy [22]. Most importantly, it is not constrained by the lab environment and can label outdoor walking data at any time and anywhere for real-time algorithm validation.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%