Pleistocene Archaeology - Migration, Technology, and Adaptation 2020
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Evolution in the Center of the Old World: An Updated Review of the South Asian Paleolithic

Abstract: The Indian Subcontinent was an important geographic region for faunal and hominin evolution in Asia. While the Oldowan as the earliest technocomplex continues to be elusive, the oldest Acheulean is dated to ~1.5 Ma and the early Middle Paleolithic is ~385 ka (from the same site). New Late Pleistocene dates have been reported for the Middle Paleolithic which continues up to 38 Ka in southern India. The Upper Paleolithic remains ambiguous and requires critically multidisciplinary investigations. The microlithic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technologically, the Mesolithic is recognized primarily by the presence of “microliths,” small stone tools which first appear in Africa at about 65 cal kyrs BP (Ambrose, 2008). In the Indian Subcontinent, the earliest dated microlithic assemblages are about 48–45 cal kyrs BP (see Chauhan, 2020 and references therein) and chronologically overlap with terminal Middle Paleolithic and Upper Paleolithic technologies at places. Microlithic technology starts before the Mesolithic phase proper and the techno-complex in general includes a wide range of small tools of different geometric and non-geometric shapes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologically, the Mesolithic is recognized primarily by the presence of “microliths,” small stone tools which first appear in Africa at about 65 cal kyrs BP (Ambrose, 2008). In the Indian Subcontinent, the earliest dated microlithic assemblages are about 48–45 cal kyrs BP (see Chauhan, 2020 and references therein) and chronologically overlap with terminal Middle Paleolithic and Upper Paleolithic technologies at places. Microlithic technology starts before the Mesolithic phase proper and the techno-complex in general includes a wide range of small tools of different geometric and non-geometric shapes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%