2010
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human ESC colony formation is dependent on interplay between self‐renewing hESCs and unique precursors responsible for niche generation

Abstract: Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) cultures are heterogeneous and constituting paracrine signals are required to maintain pluripotency. The cellular interplay and dynamic nature of this heterogeneity is not understood. Here, long-term hESC imaging and tracking revealed that hESC heterogeneity is dynamic and hESC self-renewal is dependent on colony-proximal distributions of paracrine signals. Tracking of hESCs forming colonies revealed that a biologically distinct cell type arises at the colony periphery in the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach has not been efficiently implemented, due in part to currently used inefficient cell culture and differentiation strategies, which are heavily based on cell culture as colonies and aggregated embryoid bodies (EBs) (Chen et al, 2014; Mallon et al, 2006; Thomson et al, 1998; Xu et al, 2001). These methods have led to time-consuming production of relatively low numbers of cells (Hartung et al, 2010; Kehoe et al, 2010; Serra et al, 2012), heterogeneous cellular and molecular states (Bendall et al, 2007; Chen et al, 2012a; Moogk et al, 2010; Stewart et al, 2006), and frequent reports of chromosomal abnormalities (reviewed in Baker et al, 2007; Lee et al, 2013). Certain chromosomal alterations such as trisomies 12, 17, and 20 have the capacity to confer growth advantages as indicated by comparative genetic analyses (Amps et al, 2011; Catalina et al, 2008; Draper et al, 2004; Lefort et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach has not been efficiently implemented, due in part to currently used inefficient cell culture and differentiation strategies, which are heavily based on cell culture as colonies and aggregated embryoid bodies (EBs) (Chen et al, 2014; Mallon et al, 2006; Thomson et al, 1998; Xu et al, 2001). These methods have led to time-consuming production of relatively low numbers of cells (Hartung et al, 2010; Kehoe et al, 2010; Serra et al, 2012), heterogeneous cellular and molecular states (Bendall et al, 2007; Chen et al, 2012a; Moogk et al, 2010; Stewart et al, 2006), and frequent reports of chromosomal abnormalities (reviewed in Baker et al, 2007; Lee et al, 2013). Certain chromosomal alterations such as trisomies 12, 17, and 20 have the capacity to confer growth advantages as indicated by comparative genetic analyses (Amps et al, 2011; Catalina et al, 2008; Draper et al, 2004; Lefort et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity in hPSC culture is often induced by excessive apoptotic signals and spontaneous differentiation due to suboptimal growth conditions. Thus, in colony-type culture, the heterogeneous cells are often observed in the periphery of the colonies 7,8 . It has been also shown that the cells in human embryonic stem cell (hESC) colonies exhibit differential responses to signaling molecules such as BMP-4 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was attributed to an unknown autocrine non-LIF gp130 ligand (24) (Figure 2C). Spatial variation was also found in hESC colonies in terms of Oct4 levels and Smad1 signaling (9), and cells at the periphery of hESC colonies have been shown to have distinct morphologies and different cell growth and death characteristics (48), all phenotypes that were attributed to the presence of autocrine and paracrine cues.…”
Section: Conventional Methods For Investigating Autocrine and Paracrimentioning
confidence: 99%