2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human epidemiological evidence about the association between air pollution exposure and gestational diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is substantial evidence concerning ambient air pollution and type 2 diabetes in the non-pregnant adult population, the association between ambient air pollution and GDM is less well characterised [26]. A meta-analysis of 11 studies exploring this relationship only found second trimester PM 2.5 and first and second trimester NO x exposure were associated with increased likelihood of GDM, with no association observed in pooled estimates for NO 2 , ozone or sulfur dioxide [10]. Again, comparison of our findings with those presented in the meta-analysis is challenging due to the higher exposure increments presented in the meta-analysis, highlighting the limited evidence in the low-level pollution setting, as well as the challenges in comparing heterogenous exposure periods (annual versus trimester-specific or whole of pregnancy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While there is substantial evidence concerning ambient air pollution and type 2 diabetes in the non-pregnant adult population, the association between ambient air pollution and GDM is less well characterised [26]. A meta-analysis of 11 studies exploring this relationship only found second trimester PM 2.5 and first and second trimester NO x exposure were associated with increased likelihood of GDM, with no association observed in pooled estimates for NO 2 , ozone or sulfur dioxide [10]. Again, comparison of our findings with those presented in the meta-analysis is challenging due to the higher exposure increments presented in the meta-analysis, highlighting the limited evidence in the low-level pollution setting, as well as the challenges in comparing heterogenous exposure periods (annual versus trimester-specific or whole of pregnancy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an annual average of exposure provides a surrogate for a woman's long-term background exposure. Perinatal epidemiology studies such as this typically utilise trimester-specific or whole of pregnancy exposure estimates [9][10][11][12][13]. Limited studies in this discipline have utitlised annual averages of pollutants, or proxies of pollutants (e.g., traffic density as a proxy of traffic-related air pollution) [33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, it is important to note that due to the myriad ways in which socioeconomic and environmental factors interact, it is very difficult to establish highly detailed associations of single environmental risk factors with epidemiological outcomes [14][15][16][17]. Moreover, environmental factors rarely occur in isolation; for example, a population can be exposed to a combination of pollutants from different sources, which could result in additive or synergistic effects and symptoms, making medical diagnostic processes extremely cumbersome [1].…”
Section: Environmental Burden Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide body of research has evidenced the effects of air pollution upon physical health; it causes both mortality and multiple morbidities including respiratory and cardiovascular illness (3,4). More recently links between cognition, mental health and dementia and air pollution have been identified (5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%