2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human enteric pathogens in produce: un-answered ecological questions with direct implications for food safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
62
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports that food-borne pathogens colonize, multiply, and persist long term on plants contradict the idea that food-borne illnesses are the result of casual or accidental encounters between human pathogens and produce crops (17)(18)(19). However, it is noteworthy that S. enterica cannot liberate plant nutrients (20); instead, the bacterium must rely on freely released plant exudates (e.g., from seeds and roots) or phytopathogen or insect activity for the nutrients and energy needed for growth and reproduction (21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Reports that food-borne pathogens colonize, multiply, and persist long term on plants contradict the idea that food-borne illnesses are the result of casual or accidental encounters between human pathogens and produce crops (17)(18)(19). However, it is noteworthy that S. enterica cannot liberate plant nutrients (20); instead, the bacterium must rely on freely released plant exudates (e.g., from seeds and roots) or phytopathogen or insect activity for the nutrients and energy needed for growth and reproduction (21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The ability of nontyphoidal strains of Salmonella enterica to colonize plants, including sprouts, alfalfa, lettuce, melons, and tomatoes, is highlighted by the rise in the number and severity of salmonellosis outbreaks linked to produce. The capacity of S. enterica (and other enteric pathogens) to readily multiply within plant tissues led to the hypothesis that persistence on plants is a part of the Salmonella life cycle, serving as reservoirs prior to reinfection of the preferred animal hosts (2)(3)(4)(5). Several studies have dissected the molecular basis of plant-Salmonella interactions (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. enterica populations were higher on produce infected with bacterial soft rot than on produce that was mechanically damaged or affected by fungal soft rot (12). Brute force pathogens, such as those that cause soft rot, macerate tissue by overwhelming plant defenses once population levels reach a quorum (13); they can increase S. enterica survival on plants by liberating nutrients that the human pathogen cannot access on its own (4). Stealth plant pathogens (14), such as Xanthomonas spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. enterica appears to establish reservoirs on plants and to use them as vectors to animals, a preferred host (3). What factors influence S. enterica persistence in plants is not well understood (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%